StructureSpot

Small Fisheries Revitalization Using Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) as an Indicator Species

Eldon Peters

Environmental Biology and Mathematical Modeling

Instructor: Shannon Leissner   Assistant: Shana Funderburk

Largemouth bass are a good indicator of pond health and will specify the health of the tested pond after the treatment of any adversary conditions.  The study follows the set guidelines obtained by Brady (1981) to determine the procedure needed to correct any problems concerning the pond.  The study involved treating any flaws related to the pond and monitoring its effect on the bass caught.  The bass were then compared to the pre-treatment bass to determine the effect of the revitalization.

Ponds offer an excellent setting in which to study aquatic ecosystems simply for the reason that you can control many of the variables. Because largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) are the top predator in a pond, they are affected by everything that lies beneath them on the food chain. This makes largemouth bass one of the best indicators of problems within a pond.  The data gathered in this experiment will specify the elements that need to be added or changed to create healthy pond, which will be indicated as it becomes a good fishing resource for largemouth bass.

There are many factors that contribute to the health of a pond.  Fish attractors such as brush should be placed at different depths throughout the pond.  These attractors will allow a place of ambush for large fish and a refuge for smaller fish.  The shallowest part of the pond should only be two feet deep; this depth will prevent the growth of foreign aquatic weeds.  The temperature should range between 64 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit in order to promote maximum fish growth.  Fish will tolerate a pH range of 4.6 to 11, but will thrive in water with a pH of 6.5 to 9.0.  One side of the pond should be shaded and the other should be open to the wind to churn the water and produce oxygen.  There should be enough phytoplankton to cloud the water, which will indicate that there is a sufficient amount of oxygen to sustain aquatic life (Oster, 1983).

In order to manage a productive pond one must understand the delicate balance of the ecosystem in the pond.  Located at the bottom of the food chain are plants called phytoplankton which use chlorophyll to produce food.  Zooplankton feed exclusively on phytoplankton.  Smaller baitfish feed on zooplankton.  Bream feed on small baitfish, insects, and worms.  Largemouth bass feed on anything from four-inch bream to large snakes (Oster, 1983).

Once a pond is considered unhealthy, a number of tests are run to determine the procedure needed to revitalize the pond.  The pH of the water must be tested.    If the pH is too low, limestone can be added at a ratio of one ton per acre to raise the pH by one unit.  Unfortunately nothing can be done to remedy a high pH (Brady, 1981).

An additional test is needed to determine the quantity and type of phytoplankton present in the pond.  Phytoplankton play a key role in producing oxygen.  If the population of the phytoplankton is too low, the oxygen level will decrease causing fish kills.  Therefore fertilizer must be periodically added to promote the growth of the phytoplankton, but can only be added when the temperature reaches 65 degrees Fahrenheit.  Pond fertilizer is composed of four parts phosphorus, four parts nitrogen, and two parts potassium.  The fertilizer may be applied anywhere between six and sixteen times a year, depending on the natural fertility of the pond (Brady, 1981).

If there is an overgrowth of phytoplankton, it will block the sunlight that other aquatic plants need for photosynthesis.  When the plants die, bacterial decomposition drains the pond of oxygen.  This oxygen depletion will have a devastating effect on fish.  To counteract the increase of phytoplankton, lime is added to slow the population growth (Pond Management Guidebook, 1989).

Oxygen deficiency is deadly to a pond, but it is easy to fix.  A test kit is used to find the oxygen level of the pond.  If the level is too low, an aerator puts fresh water back into the pond.  The added water should be sprayed through the air so that it causes a splash as it hits the water to intensify the oxygen content.  Another way to increase the oxygen level is to pump water from the bottom of the pond into the aerator.  The oxygenated water, located at the surface, will then shift to the bottom at a faster rate.  The water at the base of the pond will pass through the aerator and back to the surface creating a cycle (Pond Management Guidebook, 1989).

The main food for the largemouth bass in a pond is small bream that spend much of the summer in the vegetation.  If the aquatic plants are too dense, the bream will escape from the bass that are waiting to ambush its prey.  If all the vegetation is removed, the pond becomes oxygen deprived, and the bass lose their places of ambush.  The vegetation must be controlled to provide the optimum conditions for the fish.  Herbicides or aquatic mowers can be used to trim the population, and fertilizer can be used to boost the plant population (Oster, 1981).

In a proper ecosystem, there is a delicate balance between the predator and the prey.  Within the pond, the bass must feed on bream, or the bream will eat the bass eggs and decimate the population.  If the bass population is too large, the bream population will decline and the struggle for food will increase (Fig. 1) (Pond Management Guidebook, 1989).

Study Question

The purpose of this study is to correct the problems within a pond that have contributed to the reduction in fish population over the past three years.  A drop in the number of fish caught indicates a decline in water quality.  Once the problems are fixed, the number of fish will increase along with water quality.

Study Site

This study involves a man-made pond that has a small population of underweight bass.  The pond spans four acres and ranges from 0 to 12 feet deep.  The only wooden structure of the pond is a massive brush pile is at deepest part and lines the entire bank. The edges of the pond present shade on one side and an open bank, where the wind churns the water, on the other.  Water opposite the levy is shallow and offers a place for the fishes to spawn and feed.  The pond is sufficiently fertilized because there is an ample amount of vegetation and phytoplankton growth.

Methods

The methods described in Brady (1981) will be implemented to increase the number of fish caught and ultimately improve the water quality.

Results

The number of largemouth bass caught after pond treatment compared to the number of largemouth bass caught before treatment will indicate the health of the pond.  Lime, aquatic mowers, and  modified topography will be used to correct different problems related to the pond if necessary.

Conclusion

When all of the problems within the pond are corrected, the amount of largemouth bass caught should increase along with a physical growth of all the species.  The number of fish caught will serve as an indicator of pond health, and therefore of water quality, which is a major concern of people today.

Works Cited

Brady, P. 1981.  Pond Management for Sport Fishing in Arkansas.  U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service.  Pages 31-32, 34, 39, 43-47, 49-50.

Pond Management Guidebook. 1989.  NC Wildlife Resources Commission. 23 pages.

Oster, D.  1983.  Largemouth Bass.  Cy DeCrosse Incorporated.  Minnetonka, Minnesota. Page 8-16, 20, 36, 38, 89-126, 135-152.

 

 

Fish Caught

Population Condition

Only recently hatchedBass overcrowded
bream.
Mostly 3″-5″ breamBream overcrowded
Young bass, hatched
bream, few 3″-5″Balanced population
bream.

Fig.-1: Conditions of largemouth bass population based on number and type of

fish caught in a seine (Pond Management Guidebook, 1989).

 

 

A tale of 10 trout

Published Saturday May 21st, 2011
A7
R. Allen Curry
Commentary

The fishing season is upon us and when the spring flood recedes this season, New Brunswick’s brook trout will face a new onslaught of apparently starving anglers.

Click to Enlarge
Photo: Images NB
Fishermen cast for trout on Lac Baker. The provincial government’s decision to double the catch limit for brook trout in northwestern New Brunswick has raised questions about whether cabinet is playing politics with conservation.

The Minister of Natural Resources, backed by the premier, has increased the number of trout that can be harvested by an angler each day from five to 10 in the streams and rivers of northwestern N.B. According to the minister, he has good data for the trout populations and he is 100-per-cent confident the data demonstrates that doubling the harvest is sustainable. He stated that not all his biologists agree his decision is in the best interest of the trout populations. In addition, his local MLAs asked their constituents if they believed this would be a good decision and some of them thought it was a good idea.

It appears the minister is unsure of the sustainability of the increased harvest, because he is also quoted as promising more stocking of hatchery raised trout to help sustain these populations if they become depleted by harvesting.

Every new government has new ideas and approaches to managing our society’s assets, things like our health care, education, economy, and our environment. This particular tale of 10 trout shows our newest government in action and sends a clear message about Premier Alward’s approach to managing our assets.

 

Five trout, or 10?

The tale begins with a decision based on the proclaimed accurate data. How many fish can we harvest is a question asked by all fisheries managers, and indeed provincial staff are working hard and doing what they can, with very limited people and finances, to set harvest levels across the province. I have published a few scientific papers on N.B.’s brook trout populations, completed some population estimates on these northern and other populations, and have visited many brook trout streams here and across their range, so I asked to see the data the minister used to make his decision.

It won’t surprise you to know that with the continuing reductions in DNR staffing and their operational finances for fish and wildlife monitoring, the actual data is quite limited. It has many gaps, it is highly variable, and the methods for data collection are inconsistent. That doesn’t mean tables and diagrams for reports and presentations can’t be generated, but the results are impossible to interpret and therefore the data are unreliable.

There is data not discussed by the minister, which is staff surveys of how many anglers are out there and how many trout they are taking (angler effort and harvest rates). The existing data have the same quality control issues mentioned, but they tell a consistent story the biologists all agree is real.

In the northwest, anglers on average harvest seven trout per day, and elsewhere the harvest is less than three trout per day. In other words, that region’s trout populations are already under more harvesting pressure than populations elsewhere in N.B.

The statements made by anglers when they are surveyed and documented in reports bear this out: “I will catch 10, bring them back to the camp and then go back to get more.” Critical to decision making, but missing in reports and the minister’s comments, are analyses to show how many trout in total will now be harvested, how that will be monitored, and if increasing the harvest by 100 per cent (five to 10 trout) is sustainable, especially given the known pressure on these populations.

The minister indicated that more stocking of trout in the northwestern streams could occur next year to “help sustain the trout population(s).” If you read the minister’s policy for stocking fish it states, “DNR’s fish management strategies focus on responsible management of fish habitat and fish populations to promote natural reproduction of wild fish populations.”

The policy goes on to state, “it is important that the department consider all other management options prior to stocking.” The easiest option is controlling the harvest by anglers. And, implicit in the policy is that stocking streams is not a preferred option unless the stream supports a sea-run population of trout, which don’t occur upstream of the Mactaquac Dam near Fredericton.

If the northwestern brook trout populations can sustain a 100-per-cent increase in harvesting, why would DNR have to stock non-wild, hatchery trout and additionally, take this action against their policy?

The minister has stated that not all of his biologists agree with an increased trout harvest. He didn’t tell us if that was the majority opinion.

The last of the minister’s statements, and one that the Premier and other ministers are using for other issues, is their consultation with MLAs and their constituents. For the people they talked with, the “reaction was overwhelmingly positive” in favour of increasing the trout harvest.

I’m certain the majority of NBers would overwhelmingly support a reduction in taxes, but that doesn’t make it a wise choice for a sustainable province.

I know many people not in favour of increasing the trout harvest, but they may not have been the loudest voices heard by the minister and Premier. Consultation is an important element for any government initiative, but selective questioning or listening is not the best method to consult, report and act.

 

Act with caution

I’m obviously concerned about the brook trout, because I have no confidence that we understand the consequences of increasing the harvest in this region. If we can’t predict the outcome, then most of us would recommend erring on the side caution until we learned more to improve our likelihood of making the correct decision.

Take, for example, another fish issue, the cod fishery of eastern Canada. Scientists and many fishers stated their concern about continuing to increase harvests, and the decision makers chose to go against this advice. The result was the collapse of those populations and the fisheries they supported, which became both an ecological and economic disaster.

That doesn’t have to be the case in this situation. If the minister wants to change the harvest, an investment in accurate assessments and monitoring for a few years would produce the actual information needed to make a decision that sustains our fish populations and the fisheries they support.

Will the world end if brook trout populations in northwestern N.B. are lost? The answer is no, but by depleting these populations we increase the stress on their ecosystems and degrade the fishing quality and opportunities that were, after all, the original intent of the minister’s actions.

One final item that is disconcerting in this tale of 10 trout is the consistent, low priority placed on the environment by the current governing political party. In addition to the brook trout, this government (even if it didn’t start the process) has decreased the protected forest areas for deer and protecting water, undermined their protection of wetlands, allowed shale gas exploration despite unequivocal concerns for contaminating groundwater, and permitted direct pollution of waterways to allow mining opportunities to proceed. All of these actions are against the spirit of our provincial laws that protect the environment, but this government and prior governments repeatedly invoke discretionary, opt-out-of-the-law clauses provided to ministers. It would be interesting to know how many times this occurs, who benefits, and why.

In fairness to the politicians we elect, it is their job to make decisions regarding how society will operate. In fairness to the people who elect them, politicians should be completely transparent about how they made their decisions.

If a decision to increase brook trout harvests in northwestern N.B. is made because the cabinet believes the majority of voters want it to happen, then just say that despite the best advice of your staff and the majority of experts, your decision is political.

If you make a decision to develop and lose a wetland or pollute one of our waterways, just tell us publicly the reason why. Your honesty would allow people to debate and provide governments with informed opinions about how to manage our society. Indeed, it would be the best solution if the cabinet (and all cabinets) would tell us what political and dollar value it is placing on the loss of a wetland, a stream ecosystem, or a trout population. That knowledge and honesty would go a long way in educating the people whom you represent and garnering their support for your decisions.

Everything I have read and heard about Premier Alward leads me to believe he is an honest person with a desire to bring honesty and transparency to his role as leader of our province.

So far, Premier Alward’s government has yet to demonstrate a willingness to be honest and transparent about his decisions regarding our environment.

 

R. Allen Curry, Ph.D. is a Professor of Recreational Fisheries and Director of the Canadian Rivers Institute at UNB.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

 

Public Works Builds Fish Habitat in Upper St. Clair

The stream in front of the post office will now be better for fish life.

By Becky EmmersEmail the author | May 20, 2011

The Upper St. Clair Public Works department teamed up with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission during National Public Works Weekto help improve the stream that runs in front of the post office along McLaughlin Run Road.

“We had a need for some bank stabilization,” said Dave Kutschbach, superintendent of projects for the public works department.

The organizations worked together to design a project that stabilizes the bank and creates a fish habitat.

“We created structures that directs the water down the center,” Kutschbach said.

Channelizing the stream will prevent bank erosion along with providing structures for the fish to live under.

“The structures create some overhead cover for the fish to stay away from predators like birds and raccoons,” said Jon Thomas, from the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission.

Thomas said the new structures give the possibility of creating more fish life in the stream.

“There isn’t much here right now, but they’ll start to congregate,” Thomas said.

The fish include basic minnows, daces and carp, he said.

“The structures will stop sediment from going into the streams and make the water better for the organisms,” said Keith Beamer, of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission.

The Allegheny County Conservation District was also involved with the project.

“It provides dual benefits. Better relationships develop between the township, nonprofits and state organizations,” said Amy Miller, of Allegheny County Conservation. “And it results in a cleaner stream. There’s going to be less sediment so that means less flooding. And it makes it prettier.”

“This project is an example of the township’s commitment to conservation and clean streams,” Kutschbach said.

The public works department also celebrated National Public Works Week with an open house for kids and the community. Click here to read the article.

 

Fishiding helps Premier Outdoor Properties,Inc. improve fish habitat

cribs ready to go
We recently sent a custom artificial fish habitat arrangement to Nebraska to be installed in Aaron Graham’s personal pond at his home.  Aaron and his two boys stayed up late the night they arrived, each of them creating ther own personal fish attractors by bending them into shape.  We put together a plan for him with a lake map he provided showing depth, contour and swimming areas. After the habitat has been installed, the boys will be sure to let us know how they are doing.
Below you will find an excerpt from a recent premier outdoor properties blog.
"Graham Lake Bass"

Check out this product to create a fish habitat in your pond…and be “green”!!

Written by admin on May 18th, 2011

Fishiding

Spend a little time on this website to learn more about the “green” solution to cost effective fish hiding units!  This company uses “reclaimed products to reclaim habitat”–an amazing new use for vinyl siding!!    http://www.fishiding.com/

Posted in MiscellaneousNo Responses »
Tags: 

“Cast A Fly…Catch A Student” National Fishing in Schools Program

Written by admin on May 17th, 2011

http://flyfishinginschools.org/mission.htm

Check out this website!!   Be sure to pass this information along to officials at public or private schools, government agencies or non profit organizations that would benefit from this worthwhile program, which provides teachers with all the tools they’ll need to:

  • teach youth how to fish
  • experience outdoor activities and
  • gain a respect for our natural resoures

“Cast A Fly…Catch A Student”.    NFSP, National Fishing in Schools Program

Posted in MiscellaneousNo Responses »

Double Duo–Spring Fling Trophy Shoot Event

Written by admin on April 15th, 2011

spring fling trophy shoot event

Posted in MiscellaneousNo Responses »
Tags: ,

Check out the latest educational opportunities available through the Nebraska Game & Parks Commission! There’s something for everyone!

Written by admin on April 15th, 2011

Posted in MiscellaneousNo Responses »
Tags: 

The Big Bucks are on their way!!

Written by admin on March 15th, 2011

The Nebraska Big Buck Classic is just a little over a week away!  Plan now to attend the show where you’ll be able to take in all the latest trophy bucks and view Monster Bucks of the Past–proudly sponsored by Premier Outdoor Properties Inc!  Be sure to stop by our booths #728-729 and say hello–we’d love to visit with you!  Show hours are Friday, March 25, 4pm-9pm; Saturday, March 26, 9am-8pm and Sunday, March 27, 10am-4pm.   Be sure to visit our homepage and enter for a chance to win a pair of tickets for FREE ADMISSION to the event!   We’ll see you at the show!!

Posted in MiscellaneousNo Responses »
Tags: 

 

Outdoor Promotions Helping Storm Victims

Outdoor Promotions Helping Storm Victims

Outdoor Promotions, the parent company of Crappie USA and Cabela’s King Kat Tournament Trail and one of the leaders in top quality tournaments and outdoor events is proud to announce that we are working to help victims of the tremendous storms which have played havoc with the northern Alabama area.

” I have had several calls from members offering help both financially and donate time to go and help with the relief efforts underway in northern Alabama as a result of recent storms around the Weiss Lake area. Power is said to be out for a minimum of two weeks and up to 30 days in much of the area and many will be without homes for months to come”, said Outdoor Promotions President and CEO Darrell Van Vactor.

“With our upcoming Crappie USA $10,000.00 Super Event at Pickwick/Wilson lakes at Sheffield, Alabama Crappie USA will kick off a campaign to help out in this area by offering matching funds up to $2000 for donations made to this worthy cause. We will also raffle a Minn Kota Trolling Motor valued at 1300.00 at the Thursday night seminar and our normal scholarship donations at this event will be diverted to this cause as well”, said Van Vactor. The seminar will be held Thursday evening May 5th at the Emerald River Hotel, 4900 Hatch Blvd. in Sheffield, Alabama. The seminar is free and open to the public.

Anyone desiring to donate can do so through our office at Crappie USA, 125 Ruth Ave. Benton KY 42025 and if you are able to spend time volunteering please advise us and we will forward your schedule to those in charge of relief efforts.

For more information on how to help please call Outdoor Promotions Inc. at 270-395-4204.

National Sponsors of Crappie USA are: Cabela’s, Rebel Yell Bourbon, Ranger Boats, Evinrude Outboards , B ‘n’ M Poles, Minn Kota, Humminbird Electronics, Adventure Products EGO Nets, J.R. Mad’s, Charlie Brewer’s Slider Co., Big Bite Baits, TTI-Blakemore Road Runner, Driftmaster Rod Holders, Fishouflage, Touchdown, “KOOLWELL PRODUCTS”, Vicious Fishing Line, Southern Pro Tackle, Moss Back Rack Fish Attractors, Tournament Ice, World Fishing Network-WFN and Ron Gooding Insurance. The following companies furnish product to help make these events possible: Kodiak Fish Attractants and Keep Alive.

Cabela’s King Kat National Sponsors:

Cabela’s The World’s Foremost Outfitter , Rebel Yell Bourbon, Evinrude Outboards, Rippin Lips, Minn Kota Trolling Motors, Mustad Hooks, Monster Rod Holders, Tanglin with Catfish, Adventure Products- EGO Nets, Vicious Fishing, Humminbird Electronics, USCA-United States Catfish Association, WFN- World Fishing Network, Renegade Tackle, Ron Gooding Insurance, JR Mad’s Famous Fish Breading, American Pro Catters and Action Outdoors Products-Catfishing Dream Team.

This is a really cool deal.  I thank them for thier time and effort.  I hope those affected can find some peace soon.  – Capt. Johnny Greene
Fishing Report by

Capt. Johnny Greene

251-747-2872

www.fishorangebeach.com

www.gulfshoresdeepseafishing.com

www.facebook.com/IntimidatorSportfishing

www.twitter.com/FishGulfShores

www.youtube.com/fishingorangebeach

 

Imperial Oil charged

Imperial Oil charged

Andrew Livingstone
Northern News Services
Published Monday, May 16, 2011

LLI GOLINE/NORMAN WELLS – The alleged release of a corrosive substance into the Mackenzie River at Imperial Oil’s central processing facility in Norman Wells has landed the company in court on seven charges of contaminating the water system and failing to comply with its water licence.

Court documents revealed Imperial Oil Resources NWT Ltd. and Nalco Canada were summoned to court by an enforcement officer for Environment Canada for offences dating back to 2009. The court documents allege that between Oct. 3, 2009 and Nov. 3, 2009 Imperial Oil deposited or permitted the deposit of a corrosive inhibitor known as Nalco 7390 into the freshwater system upstream from the plant cooling heat exchangers – a summary offence under the Fisheries Act.

Imperial Oil and Nalco face charges under both the Fisheries Act and the Northwest Territories Water Act for the alleged dumping of the material into the water system, which is considered to be lethal to fish and fish habitat.

The two companies face three counts of violating Section 36(3) of the Fisheries Act, which if found guilty could result in a fine of up to $300,000 for a summary conviction or up to $1 million for an indictable conviction and up to six months in prison.

The companies are also charged with four counts of violating Section 40(1)(a) of the NWT Waters Act for dumping waste, “in any other place under conditions in which the waste, or any other waste that results from the deposit of that waste, may enter any waters in a water management area.” The maximum fine for violating this section of the act is $100,000 and/or jail time not exceeding one year.

Imperial Oil is also charged with failing to comply with its water licence under Section 40(2) of the territorial Waters Act.

The case was scheduled to be before a judge in Norman Wells on May 10.

Calls to the Crown prosecutor’s office were not returned prior to press deadline.

 

E-mailWe welcome your opinions. Click here to e-mail a letter to the editor.

 

Lake rehab project continues this summer

Lake rehab project continues this summer

ShareShare
Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
fisherman 

fisherman

This trout may look like a trophy, but it’s likely a rainbow-cutthroat hybrid. An ongoing FWP project is trying to stop hybridization of trout in 21 high mountain lakes along the Hungry Horse Reservoir and in the Bob Marshall Wilderness.

Posted: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 2:11 pm

By CHRIS PETERSON Hungry Horse News | 0 comments

 

On a hot day last summer, biologists from Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks ventured to Danaher Creek, deep in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, and caught hundreds of young purebred westslope cutthroat trout.

The fish made the 24-mile journey out of the wilderness on the backs of mules, packed in water-filled coolers fed with bottled oxygen. Once out of the wilderness, they were transported to their new home at the Sekokini Springs hatchery in Coram.

“We had 100 percent survival,” FWP biologist Matt Boyer told interested anglers last week.

Many of those fish and their offspring will have a new home in the Necklace Chain of Lakes in 2012 as part of an ongoing effort to preserve westslope cutthroats in the South Fork.

Since 2007, the Westslope Cutthroat Trout Conservation Project has slowly, but surely, been replacing non-native fish and hybrids in lakes in the South Fork drainage in an effort to preserve some of the last remaining purebred strains of westslope cutthroats in the nation.

This year, the effort will continue in the Necklace Chain of Lakes in the Bob Marshall Wilderness. In late August, FWP biologists and technicians will treat the small lakes and a portion of the outlet stream with rotenone, a chemical that kills fish.

Rotenone is not hazardous to humans, but it prevents the absorption of oxygen across a fish’s gills. Death comes quickly. Rotenone was first used by South American and Asian natives to catch fish. It was originally derived from the roots of the derris plant, a pea species from Asia, and the lonchocarpus plant, from South America.

Rotenone will be hauled in by mules and applied to the Necklace Chain of Lakes. Biologists will cut the bladders of dead fish that rise to the top to prevent attracting bears and other birds.

The treatment can linger up to three months, biologists note. A chemical that neutralizes rotenone will be applied downstream from the outlets of the lakes to prevent harm to fish further downstream.

All told, the treatment will take a few days. The following spring, the effects of the rotenone will have dispersed, and the lakes can be re-stocked with purebred westslope cutthroat trout.

Prior to treatment, lakes in the conservation project were rife with non-native fish, including rainbow trout, rainbow-cutthroat crosses and yellowstone cutthroat crosses. The worry among biologists is that the continued hybridization of westslope trout with non-native fish eventually will wipe out the purebred cutts in the South Fork.

To date, Black, Blackfoot, Big Hawk, Clayton and Wildcat lakes have been treated and re-stocked. Many of the lakes are fishing well already, Boyer said, and some lakes already have natural fish reproduction just a year after being re-stocked.

Several other lakes are being treated through an effort known as “swamping,” where hundreds of purebred westslope cutthroat trout are added to a lake that contains hybrid fish. As the fish breed overtime, it’s hoped that the hybrid genetics will be squeezed out of the population.

All told, the entire project will cover 21 lakes in the Bob Marshall and Jewel Basin area. Biologists have also teamed up with the Backcountry Horsemen of the Flathead for packing services.

There are challenging waters ahead. Handkerchief Lake poses challenges because the outlet stream, Graves Creek, is short and flows into the Hungry Horse Reservoir. Biologists will have to be careful not to kill trout in the reservoir itself.

One the of the last lakes to be treated will be Sunburst, a large lake in the Bob Marshall that will need thousands of pounds of rotenone for treatment

—————

 

A state hatchery in Coram recently received the final funding it needs to complete its construction. The Sekokini Springs Westslope Cutthroat Isolation Facility, located off the North Fork of the Flathead River near Blankenship Bridge, is one of two hatcheries in Montana where wild, genetically pure strains of trout are accepted.

The Northwest Power and Conservation Council recently approved about $1.8 million in funding for the state-run hatchery that’s been operating as an advanced conservation hatchery for more than a decade. The funding will be used over the next few years to finish the hatchery’s master plan, which calls for an outdoor pond and stream habitat to complement the indoor isolation facility.

While other hatcheries rely on the state’s only westslope cutthroat brood stock at the Washoe Park Trout Hatchery in Anaconda, Sekokini Springs will serve as a diversity resource for Montana waters that have lost genetically pure strains of westslope cutthroat trout over the years, said Fish, Wildlife and Parks biologist Brian Marotz, who helped manage the Sekokini hatchery since it was acquired by the state in 1998.

Sekokini Springs operated as a private rainbow trout farm for about 40 years on land leased from the Flathead National Forest. The state acquired the improvements, including a 60-by-40-foot building with concrete raceways, for about $70,000. The building was insulated to prevent condensation, damaged siding was replaced, and the artesian springs that supply the facility were capped and piping was installed to secure the water supply from airborne contaminants.

Sekokini Springs is used to quarantine juvenile cutthroat collected from wild sources. The fish are held in raceways, tested for disease and genetic purity, and eventually certified for use as a hatchery resource. FWP has identified about 50 genetically pure strains in the wild to draw from, mostly in South Fork drainages. Cutthroats in other drainages have been exposed to hybridization with rainbow and Yellowstone cutthroat trout strains.

Ironically, Sekokini Springs may have been a primary source for rainbow hybridization in the lower Flathead River system. The hatchery likely “leaked” fish over the years into the North Fork Flathead River, Marotz said. The hatchery now is entirely contained, and its waste water is disposed of through a special drainfield.

With the new funding, the building will be expanded, and two large, still-functioning ponds will be restored and converted into four ponds. Another pond will be created to grow wild feed. Grasshoppers and meal worms already are being cultivated at the hatchery.

Posted in  on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 2:11 pm.

 

Natural Fish Habitat

Fish Habitat        

Vernon County
Land & Water Conservation Department

In some streams, sport fish populations are limited by the amount of available cover and shelter (submerged boulders, logs, tree roots, undercut banks, and overhanging vegetation). Fish use these protective areas to rest, hide from predators, and catch food items drifting in the swirling currents that occur around submerged structures, and avoid territorial conflicts. Large sport fish often select a sheltered site as their territory from which they exclude other adult fish. Adding boulders, anchoring logs and trees, and building platforms along the banks can increase Sport fish abundance in streams without sufficient cover.
Sediment from eroding banks may cover the streambed and destroy productive spawning areas. Over-hanging grassy vegetation is of critical importance to fish habitat, providing cover places for insects to live and shade to keep the water cool. The full potential of a fishery can’t be reached without adequate vegetative cover.
Streambank erosion from agriculturally impacted banks contributed an estimated 17,112 tons (24%) of the total sediment delivered to surface waters in the Middle Kickapoo River watershed alone.
In-stream structures are built to extend out into the stream channels.They are intended to protect eroding streambanks and create hiding, resting, and feeding places for sport fish.
One example of an in-stream structure is a weir. A weir is basically a “V” shaped line of large rocks that points upstream. The flow of the water over the weir creates a deeper pool immediately downstream.
Weirs can be used in any size stream. Frequently, streambeds need to be narrowed to increase the rate of water flowing over the in-stream structures.
Small, deeper pools are sometimes also built into streams. Whenever fish habitat structures and in-stream work is planned, the streambanks are stabilized as part of the process.
Frequently, LUNKERS are installed when the streambank is being stabilized. (Find out more about LUNKERS here).
This LUNKERS was placed along a streambank.
After the LUNKERS have been installed, they are covered with rock. Soil covers most of the rock, and will be seeded.
In a relatively short time, the grasses planted along the streambank will take hold and help to naturalize the area.
Besides stabilizing streambanks, reducing the sediment entering our fresh water streams, and creating a desirable habitat for fish, streambank stabilization/fish habitat improvement projects become almost invisible once they have aged.

 

CRAYFISH – ASSET OR LIABILITY? – BY DR. RICHARD O. ANDERSON AND BOB LUSK

CRAYFISH – ASSET OR LIABILITY? – BY DR. RICHARD O. ANDERSON AND BOB LUSK
Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 5:29pm

Pond Boss moderator Dave Davidson examines a crawfish trap. Pondmeister Johnny Tanner, from Carrollton, Georgia, has a small pond where he raises crawfish to feed his bass in a larger lake. Inset: Oronectes, ‘papershell crayfish’ from Missouri.

Any bass angler who fishes Midwestern ponds or lakes can testify to the importance or frequency of finding remains of crayfish in stomachs of largemouth bass (LMB). When food habits of LMB were studied at Murphy Flowage, Wisconsin many years ago, the most prominent forage item was crayfish. A conclusion of the study was that LMB were not an effective predator on the high-density population of slow growing bluegill (BLG). Biologists failed to recognize that panfish outweighed the total weight of LMB by about 10:1. Apparently when LMB have relatively little competition for food they chose crayfish over forage fish. What would you choose in your favorite cafeteria offering free food, lobster or fish?

A sidelight of the Murphy Flowage studies was a major effort to improve BLG growth rate by removing as many fish as possible with large seines. Large seines have relatively large mesh and were effective at harvesting the largest fish of the adult population. It was a surprise to discover that subsequent to the removal, BLG growth rate declined. Harvesting adult bluegill resulted in reduced competition for food, an explosion of bluegill reproduction and a dramatic increase in BLG numbers in the lake.

More recent studies have shown that in order to have a balanced population of BLG with good growth and fish of quality (6-inch) and larger sizes, at least 90% annual mortality of age-I and age-II BLG (1.5 to 3.5 inches long) is needed: i.e. 10,000 age-I reduced to 1000 age-II which are reduced to 100 age-III. BLG of this size and age are prey for LMB 12 to 15 inches long. In well balanced communities of BLG and LMB a favorable total weight ratio is 3 or 4 to 1 at any point in time.

Two other unsuccessful efforts to improve growth rate and size structure of forage are informative. In one case, in Wisconsin, adult northern pike were introduced into a population of stunted yellow perch. The result was a decline in the number of quality-size perch. A second case in Nebraska was an effort to reduce numbers and improve size distribution of bullheads by stocking an effective predator, adult flathead catfish. In both cases the introductions did not result as intended because both predators were selective for the largest of the forage available in the lake. The principle learned is the importance of the relationship between size of predator and size of prey.

Back to the question of crayfish. The rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) is an unwelcome visitor in some northern lakes. It has been introduced by anglers using crayfish as bait… not the first time the bait bucket has been a source of an introduction. The impact in many of these lakes has been loss of valuable habitat and native aquatic plants.

I had a similar experience with a different species of Orconectes in a one-acre fishing pond in Missouri. The pond was about 8 feet deep and with clear water. There was a ring of vegetation growing to a depth of 7 feet. In mid-summer the pond looked like a donut with a small opening in the deepest part. Fishing was difficult or impossible except in early spring.

In the fall I had the opportunity to introduce about 10 gallons of crayfish, a byproduct of some other fishing pond research. From my perspective the result was a success. The following year water transparency declined to about 2 feet and vegetation was limited to water less than 2 feet deep. It was easy to fish the pond from shore all summer long. The species of crayfish in this genus do not burrow but have a strong thigmotaxis–a desire to be touching something. In native habitat that could be a log or rock that they could get next to or under. In clay-bottom ponds they work to form a shallow depression where they rest during the day. This tactic may help to avoid predation.

In a small shallow pond without fish and wall-to-wall vegetation, I introduced a small number of Orconectes. The next summer the pond looked muddy; the water transparency was reduced to a few inches and a plant hook came back empty. The aquatic plants were gone. The impact of the crayfish was excessive.

In an established fishing pond with an excess of rooted vegetation into deep water the introduction of Orconectes might yield positive results by improving conditions for fishing, increasing capacity for production of LMB, possibly promoting better wind induced circulation, an improved oxygen profile and a reduction or avoidance of excessively high pH due to decreased aquatic plant mass. The problem is how to find a source of Orconectes?

Fish farmers often produce crayfish in minnow ponds. There, crayfish can be a liability because they injure minnows when ponds are seined or harvested. On fish farms, crayfish are an unwanted byproduct. It is unlikely to find crayfish in catfish ponds because they are a preferred food item.

An easy source of crayfish is the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) sold for human food. Production is a major industry in rice fields. Although Orconectes prefers to feed on vegetation, the red swamp crayfish can be carnivorous and eat insect larvae, tadpoles, snails and small fish. Such food habits would not be an asset in most fishing ponds. Red swamp crayfish have been introduced into many areas. An undesirable attribute of the genus and a relative, Cambarus, is the habit of burrowing. Burrowing activity can damage water control structures, dams and levees. P. clarkii is an intermediate host for parasitic helminthes of vertebrates. Because of adverse affects, efforts for eradication have been attempted in some areas.

What might a pond owner do to introduce something with limited ability for natural dispersion that would feed primarily on plant material or detritus and increase the production of food for fish? A critter that has appeal to me is a different decapod, Palaemonetes, a freshwater prawn also called glass shrimp. They are relatively small, up to 2 inches long, and free swimming. I introduced some into a sediment trap pond above a 35-acre lake in Missouri. They moved downstream and have persisted in the lake for many years.

What about simply buying red swamp crayfish and using them as supplemental food for LMB? Sure, it has been done, countless times. As a pond manager, your job is to learn the facts and make the best decisions you can make. One pondmeister, in central Oklahoma, has bought different kinds of living supplemental food for his bass for years. During the crayfish season, he might buy 2,000 pounds to stock into his 10 acre lake. His mission is to supplement the natural food chain. For him, it works. His bass are so overcrowded that crayfish don’t stand a chance to establish themselves. There is relatively little crayfish habitat and so many bass that the mudbugs don’t stand much of a chance at survival. Advantage, bass.

But, look at another real world case. In 1984, lake manager Billy Cooper, from Houston, Texas, helped renovate a well-known fishing lake that sits less than fifteen miles from the Texas coast. The lake was drained, bulldozers did their magic, rearranging heavy clay soils in the flat country. The lake refilled and restocked with forage fish to set the table to grow giant largemouth bass.

Within months, the lake looked like chocolate milk. What happened?

This 30 acre lake sits in the middle of rice country along the Texas gulf coast. After the bulldozers left, the landowner seeded part of the lake bottom with rye grass and let it grow to six inches before flooding the lake in January… about the time crayfish are feeding and growing as fast as they can.

The source of the muddy water was literally hundreds of pounds of growing, thriving crayfish, fighting for food and for space and stirring bottom clay soils. These creatures were outcompeting the fish, overeating the food chain and making the lake muddy.

After a concerted effort at trapping, crayfish numbers were reduced to the point that fish could begin to thrive and the water cleared well enough the lake could perform as wished. In this case, crayfish cost the landowner some time and were a problem.

Crayfish asset or liability? The best answer is, it all depends. If they are introduced under appropriate circumstances, it would be important to prevent overharvest of LMB and maintain numbers and sizes to take advantage of an increased food supply. If you get a good population established you may decide to trap out a mess to make a poor-man shrimp cocktail or a New Orleans gumbo. Bon Apetit.

POND BOSS Magazine is the world’s leading resource for fish, pond and fisheries management information including discussions on muddy water, raising trophy fish, fish feeding, building a pond, algae control and more. Check us out at www.pondboss.com or contact Bob Lusk, the Pond Boss himself, at 903-564-5372. His books, Basic Pond Management, Raising Trophy Bass and Perfect Pond, Want One, may be purchased by calling 800-687-6075 or ordering online at www.pondboss.com

 

 

Artificial PVC Fish Attractors by Fishiding for Building Fish Cover Author: Brad Wiegmann

?
?Here’s a pro’s view of the newest artificial fish habitat from Fishiding.com

Fishiding fish attractors easly fit in to a boat to be place in your pond or lake.

http://www.bradwiegmann.com/pond-fishing/pond-management/585-artificial-pvc-fish-attractors-by-fishiding-for-building-fish-cover.html

Bending limbs out on Fishiding PVC artificial fish attractors Fishiding Safehouse model

Scroll to Top