StructureSpot

SARP Projects Restore Habitat

Georgia SARP Projects Restore Habitat for Fish and Communities

Water, water, water…  This topic is on the public agenda in dozens of ways.  Nothing is more important than water for human health and the health of our fish and wildlife resources.

In survey after survey, clean water is one of the most prominent environmental concerns in the United States.  Clean water and abundant habitat are critical to functional aquatic ecosystems with healthy populations of fish and wildlife.

One exciting example of a project that’s improving water quality and fish habitat is in Raccoon Creek in the Etowah River Watershed of Northwest Georgia.  This stream is critical to the long-term survival of a variety of aquatic insects, and fish, including the federally endangered Etowah darter and threatened Cherokee darter, the lined chub, and the recreationally-fished redeye bass. But threats loom. The creek flows through Metro Atlanta’s Paulding County, where agricultural practices and land clearing for development make it more difficult for the fish to survive.  The restoration project involves multiple partners, including the Southeast Aquatic Resources Partnership (SARP), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Georgia Department of Natural Resources (GA DNR), Paulding County, Georgia Power, Upper Coosa Riverkeeper, Georgia River Network, and Kennesaw State University.  For project details go to http://bit.ly/SARPRRC.

Through collaborative funding programs with USFWS, National Fish Habitat Partnership (NFHAP) and the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration’s

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in proven science based, fish protection.

(NOAA) Restoration Center, and work with state agencies and local partners, SARP identifies and implements habitat restoration projects throughout the Southeast.  On-the-ground projects, like the Raccoon Creek Watershed Stream Restoration in Paulding NOAA

County, Georgia, are helping to address regional habitat objectives and national conservation priorities.

To learn more about SARP and its partners, programs and projects, visit www.southeastaquatics.net or contact SARP Coordinator.

by OUTDOOR HUB

submitted by: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Grant Funding for Habitat Restoration Projects

Grant Funding is Available for Community-based Habitat Restoration Projects

The FishAmerica Foundation, the conservation and research foundation of the American Sportfishing Association, has funds available for marine and anadromous sportfish habitat restoration projects throughout coastal America, the Great Lakes region, and all U.S. Territories through its partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Restoration Center.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in proven science based, fish protection.

Fish Habitat Key Part of B.A.S.S.Summit

B.A.S.S. News Announcement: Conservation Summit Deemed ‘Huge Success’

Awesome. Tremendous. Terrific.  That’s the way that state conservation directors (CD) for the B.A.S.S. Federation Nation summed up their experience at the recent Conservation Summit in Shreveport, La.

Staged during Bassmaster Classic Week, the event featured 2 ½ days of presentations and discussions on issues of concern to bass anglers nationwide. Fisheries experts from universities also attended, as did fish chiefs and biologists from state and federal agencies.

“The Conservation Summit was terrific,” said Scott Sowell, veteran CD from Maryland. “Noreen (National Conservation Director Noreen Clough) did a fantastic job putting it together, and I left fired up to spread the word on keeping bass alive!

“It was great interacting with CDs and fisheries biologists from all over the country. I learned quite a bit about conservation issues and practices in other states and steps they take to protect the fishery.”

Clough called the Summit “a huge success,” but wanted no credit for it being so. “I was impressed with the number of states who recognized the value of this and attended,” she said.

“And it was capped off by a variety of academics like Dave Philipp from the University of Illinois, Mike Allen from the University of Florida and Jeff Koppelman from the Missouri Department of Conservation. They stimulated thought and conversations.”

Those three joined Gene Gilliland from the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and others as presenters on Day 2 of the event, billed as a Fisheries Management Workshop.

“We talked about the state of the science on black bass issues,” Gilliland said. “We made presentations on some of the more controversial issues, such as fishing for spawning bass, to give the CDs a feel for what is going on, and then we had question-and-answer time.”

Based on the presentations and follow-up breakout sessions, attendees then identified major management issues for black bass fisheries. They include the following:

  • Fish care during tournaments, with pro anglers serving as role models.
  • Introduction of native and non-native species, including anglers who illegally move fish.
  • Large-scale habitat projects, with federal involvement.
  • Current and future water wars, and the need for anglers to partner with U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the states to ensure allocations for fisheries.
  • Fostering better relationships with fisheries agencies.

The Summit also included national and state legislative updates from Gordon Robertson of the American Sportfishing Association and Chris Horton, Mid-States Coordinator for the National Assembly of Sportsmen Caucuses. The two also led a discussion on working with legislators.

“You have to engage politically because management of our natural resources often is political instead of biological,” Horton said.

On the Summit’s final day, Gilliland explained the process behind fisheries management, and fish chiefs provided the “state perspective” on building partnerships.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in proven science based, fish protection.

Additionally, representatives from the FWS talked about that agency’s programs and the 75th anniversary of the Sportfish Restoration Program (also known as Wallop-Breaux), which provides millions of dollars annually for state fisheries management through excise taxes on fishing gear.

2012 Bassmaster Classic Official Sponsors: Toyota, Bass Pro Shops, Berkley, Evan Williams Bourbon, Humminbird, Mercury, Minn Kota, Nitro Boats, Skeeter Boats, Triton Boats, Yamaha

2012 Bassmaster Classic Supporting Sponsor: Carhartt

About B.A.S.S.

For more than 40 years, B.A.S.S. has served as the authority on bass fishing. The organization advances the sport through advocacy, outreach and an expansive tournament structure while connecting directly with the passionate community of bass anglers through its Bassmaster media vehicles.

The Bassmaster brand and its multimedia platforms are guided by a mission to serve all fishing fans. Through its industry-leading publications — Bassmaster Magazine and B.A.S.S. Times — comprehensive website Bassmaster.com and ESPN2 and Outdoor Channel television programming, Bassmaster provides rich, leading-edge content true to the lifestyle.

The Bassmaster Tournament Trail includes the Bassmaster Elite Series, Bass Pro Shops Bassmaster Open Series, Carhartt Bassmaster College Series, Cabela’s B.A.S.S. Federation Nation events and the ultimate celebration of competitive fishing, the Bassmaster Classic.

B.A.S.S. offers an array of services to its more than 500,000 members and remains focused on issues related to conservation and water access. The organization is headquartered in Birmingham, Ala.By Staff Writer

B.A.S.S. Summit Awards Fishiding Artificial Fish Habitat

Conservation Summit Emphasizes Fisheries Management  

SHREVEPORT, La. — B.A.S.S. will renew an old tradition at this year’s Bassmaster Classic, when it plays host to a 2 ½-day Conservation Summit.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection. This something that I promised to do when I came back to B.A.S.S. last year,” said National Conservation Director Noreen Clough, who added that she is “very excited to bring back an historic event unique to B.A.S.S. Conservation.”
Federation Nation conservation directors, state fisheries managers, academics, “and other notables in fisheries and aquatic resource conservation” will attend.
An inaugural Fisheries Management Workshop on Saturday will be one of the summit’s highlights, as will a keynote address by Jim Martin, Berkley Conservation Institute director, at Saturday night’s awards banquet. Martin also will give closing comments on Sunday.
“Jim is a great partner with B.A.S.S. and an awesome motivational speaker in the conservation world,” Clough said.
Saturday’s workshop will feature Dr. Mike Allen from the University of Florida, Dr. David Philipp from the University of Illinois, and Gene Gilliland from the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, three of the nation’s foremost experts on fisheries management.
“We’ve been able to bring together fisheries scientists from universities and states around the country to share with us the latest in black bass management,” said Clough.
Among other topics, Philipp will provide “the Northern perspective” on fishing for nesting bass, and Allen will offer the Southern perspective. Gilliland will talk about tournament mortality issues, catch-and-release impacts on growth, and advances in techniques and tools, including the Alabama Rig.
Conservation directors also will learn about trends in fish culture and stocking, illegal stocking, and spatial patterns in bass habitat use and angling. They then will move to breakout sessions to discuss management and science/outreach needs for bass fisheries.
Following a welcome from B.A.S.S. co-owner Jim Copeland, Friday’s agenda will feature mentoring sessions, legislative updates, and news from the conservation directors. The latter will include the latest on ReBaits, the popular program initiated by Florida’s Eamon Bolten to encourage anglers to recycle or properly dispose of their used plastic baits.
Gordon Robertson, vice-president of the American Sportfishing Association, and Chris Horton, mid-states coordinator for the Assembly of State Caucuses, will discuss federal and state legislation related to fisheries, as well as offer insights about working with legislators and getting involved politically.
Allen and Dr. Mike Netherland from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will discuss aquatic vegetation management and related issues, including the likelihood that herbicide application changes the behavior of fish.

Sunday’s half-day program will offer insights on how to partner with state agencies from a panel of fisheries chief, a look at the process behind fisheries management from Gilliland, and federal updates on the 75th anniversary of the Sport Fish Restoration Program (Wallop-Breaux) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fisheries program.

Conservation effort sets priorities for habitat

By DOUG WARNOCK

For the Capital Press

Forest resources, arid lands habitat and Puget Sound health were the areas selected as priorities for the Washington State Coordinated Resource Management program.

Washington’s CRM Executive Committee and CRM Task Group met together to establish program priorities. Reduced funding and loss of a full-time program coordinator precipitated the need to streamline activities and focus on high-priority needs.

The three areas deemed of greatest need were:

* Forest resources, emphasizing water issues.

* Arid lands habitat, focusing on sage grouse and endangered fish.

* Puget Sound health, emphasizing improved water quality.

The CRM Task Group is implementing a plan to assist new groups organized to address issues in the three priority areas, while continuing to support existing CRM groups across the state. The Task Group is led by Kevin Guinn, Natural Resources Conservation Service range management specialist, and facilitated by Ray Ledgerwood, Washington Conservation Commission Program Facilitator.

Coordinated resource management is a collaborative approach to resolving issues and improving management of land and water resources. The approach has been in existence in Washington state for over 50 years and has resulted in improved health of soil and water resources across the state.

A group in the Tenmile Watershed of Whatcom County stabilized stream banks and improved fish habitat. It involved local dairies, poultry producers, fruit and vegetable farmers and many community members.

A program in Klickitat County resulted in the development of 30 springs as water sources for wildlife and livestock, installation of 50 miles of fence to protect riparian areas and trees planted on 100,000 acres for forest renewal.

These are just two examples of successful programs. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection.

Planning for any program is done by the local people who are responsible for managing the land and who have the best knowledge of the situation. Resources of the State CRM Executive Committee and the state CRM Task Group are available to support local groups as needed.

The program planning process empowers local people to solve land use and natural resource issues through collaboration. It brings people together, enhancing communications and reducing conflicts, to help find common ground while working toward the achievement of mutual goals.

Consensus is the basis for success in planning. The approach works because planning together across ownership lines and management boundaries results in better resource health, helps people meet their objectives and minimizes conflict among participants. While there may be a difference in how individuals view a problem or situation, all have an interest in the land’s well-being and can find mutual objectives for its benefit.

The CRM Executive Committee is composed of the heads of the state and federal agencies associated with land and water resources. The CRM Task Group includes representatives of the same state and federal agencies involved in the Executive Committee, as well as several members at large. All are dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of natural resources in the state.

Doug Warnock, retired from Washington State University Extension, now lives on a ranch in the Touchet River Valley where he consults and writes on ranch management.

Information

DuPont approves watershed restoration and mining permit application agreement to improve fish habitat

DUPONT – The DuPont City Council last night authorized the city’s mayor to sign a settlement agreement allowing development of a plan to restore the Sequalitchew Creek watershed, including Edmond Marsh. The Settlement Agreement also allows CalPortland Co. (CalPortland) to apply for gravel mining and reclamation permits in areas adjacent to its existing mine. The City Council, by a vote of 5 to 1, has now joined in the accord – negotiated over a three-year period ending in 2011.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection.

The City Council’s action was the final step needed to ratify the 2011 DuPont Settlement Agreement. The other signers are: the Nisqually Delta Association; the Washington Environmental Council; People for Puget Sound; the Tahoma, Black Hills and Seattle chapters of the National Audubon Society; the Anderson Island Quality of Life Committee (together known as the Environmental Caucus); CalPortland; the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology); and now the City of DuPont.

The agreement describes a process that the parties agree to follow to restore flows to Sequalitchew Creek using funds provided by CalPortland. The idea is to permanently protect Sequalitchew Creek and the ravine it flows through before emptying into Puget Sound. The agreement also establishes a number of conditions under which CalPortland may submit applications to access additional areas designated for gravel extraction under the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the State Growth Management Act. The agreement does not approve or authorize any mining. It only establishes the conditions under which the Environmental Caucus agrees not to oppose CalPortland’s applications. Both the restoration plan and mining proposal will undergo the normal review processes, including opportunities for public input. Any mining proposal will need to complete the entire regulatory process and meet all regulatory requirements in addition to being dependent on the successful development, environmental review, permitting and funding of the watershed restoration plan.

DuPont Mayor Michael Grayum said: “This comprehensive agreement is about our environment and our economy, both in our city and throughout the region. It’s not often that environmental leaders, industry, and a local government and regulatory agency come together to agree upon a process with enough checks and balances to protect the broader community interests and help restore the environmental condition of our watershed. We appreciate the many subject matter experts, neighbors, organizations and regulatory entities involved in this lengthy negotiation. Looking forward, we also appreciate the many others who will develop and implement the restoration plan for Sequalitchew Creek.”

Tom Skjervold, president of the Nisqually Delta Association, representing the Environmental Caucus, said: “We want to thank the City Council, the Mayor and City staff for their careful and detailed consideration of this agreement. After three years of negotiations to reach the 2011 Settlement Agreement, we’re now ready to begin the process of developing the restoration plan for the Sequalitchew Creek watershed. We look forward to working with the City, the DuPont community, Joint Base Lewis-McChord and local, state and federal regulatory agencies to ensure that mining and reclamation are done responsibly and that the watershed is restored.”

Pete Stoltz, CalPortland’s permit manager, said: “We also want to thank the Mayor, the City Council and staff for their careful consideration of the agreement. We want to carry forward the positive, cooperative relationship we have with the Environmental Caucus, Ecology and the City to other stakeholders and restore flows and fish habitat in Sequalitchew Creek. This is a great opportunity for the community to restore an important natural and historic feature and for us to continue providing needed sand and gravel resources to the region. We look forward to working with the community on the restoration plan and the environmental studies because these sand and gravel resources are needed for our region’s economic recovery and to get many unemployed workers back on the job.”

Sally Toteff, Ecology’s Southwest Region director, said: “This continuation of the 1994 Settlement Agreement includes preservation of 45 acres of Puget Sound shore lands and adjacent open space as well as improving flows in Sequalitchew Creek – both of which will help restore South Puget Sound. Our negotiations were able to bring private entities, government agencies and local and regional environmental groups together to create an extraordinary opportunity for long-awaited restoration to occur.”

The parties will work with South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group (SPSSE), Joint Base Lewis-McChord and the Nisqually Tribe – with input from citizen and community groups and government agencies – to develop and implement the restoration plan. After needed permits are received, SPSSE will manage implementation of the plan, with additional input from the community and other key stakeholders. CalPortland will provide funding for developing, reviewing, permitting and implementing the plan.

“This was a long and at times very tough negotiation, but early on we saw the potential for a settlement when we were able to quickly agree on a clear set of goals that called for restoring and enhancing the Sequalitchew Creek watershed, including restoration of stream flows along the entire creek,” Skjervold said. “The creek has had problems for more than half a century, and for at least 25 years now there have been a number of efforts to restore parts of the watershed. However, this is the first time we’ve had a chance to address the watershed as an ecologically integrated whole: from Sequalitchew Lake, through the group of marshes, down the length of the creek and into Puget Sound. We kept this clearly in mind when linking any mining proposal with a requirement for restoring and enhancing the watershed.”

Changes in the watershed and creek channel in the 1800s and early 1900s harmed fish habitat and water flow over time. Recent studies show that even modest increases in the water flowing through the creek would dramatically improve access to, and quality of, its fish habitat.

The Settlement Agreement also includes a process for developing a strong monitoring program. This program will be designed to ensure that the restoration plan works during mining, reclamation and when the area is redeveloped according to its underlying zoning.

“The ideas we discussed during negotiations, and those developed as the plan is being completed, will be designed to help restore and enhance the marsh and creek,” Skjervold said. “The requirement for a monitoring program will ensure that members of the Environmental Caucus and the community will know how the plan is actually working.”

The mediated negotiations that resulted in the settlement agreement were held among parties that might otherwise have engaged in lengthy and costly litigation.

“We think we achieved a fair balance that protects and enhances the habitat in Edmond Marsh and Sequalitchew Creek, but still allows an application to be made for gravel mining in areas designated for this purpose,” Stoltz said. “There will be additional environmental and permitting review of any gravel mining proposal. Regardless of the outcome, no mining can occur in the South Parcel mining area unless an approved watershed restoration plan is developed, permitted and implementation begins.”

More information about the agreement is available for review on:

The Department of Ecology’s website (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/puget_sound/index.html)

DuPont’s website (http://www.ci.dupont.wa.us/)

CalPortland’s DuPont website (http://www.calportlandresources.com/dupont/default.aspx)

###

Media Contacts:

  • Sally Toteff, Southwest Region director, Department of Ecology (360) 407-6307
  • Pete Stoltz, permitting manager, CalPortland (206) 764-3000
  • Tom Skjervold, president, Nisqually Delta Association (360) 485-9470
  • Michael Grayum, DuPont Mayor (253) 912-5218

###

Fact Sheet: Specifics of the DuPont Settlement Agreement

For more than two decades, various organizations have contemplated restoration of Sequalitchew Creek. However, until the 2011 DuPont Settlement Agreement was negotiated and approved, funding and stakeholder interest were not sufficient to complete the restoration process. The settlement agreement provides stakeholders with an invitation to participate in a process and a reliable source of funding to coordinate, plan, permit and implement restoration. It also obligates CalPortland to pay up to $200,000 for development of a Sequalitchew Creek Restoration Plan, as well as additional funding for the environmental and permitting reviews and the implementation of the plan.

Specifically, the settlement agreement provides:

  • Funding for developing a plan to help restore flows from Sequalitchew Lake, through Edmond Marsh and into Sequalitchew Creek, regardless of whether any mine permits are issued. Multiple stakeholders, including DuPont citizen organizations, are invited to take part in this planning.
  • Funding for permitting and implementing restoration of Sequalitchew Creek if certain milestones are achieved. Among these are completion of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) and agreement on a monitoring plan to be developed by CalPortland and the Environmental Caucus.
  • Permanent protection of 45 acres of open space, including nearly a mile of Puget Sound shorelands and adjacent upland property.
  • An easement for approximately one mile of pedestrian trail.

The agreement prescribes five elements to the Restoration Plan. These are:

  • Restoration of gradients so water discharges from Hamer and Bell marshes flow into Edmond Marsh rather than a diversion canal.
  • Improvements to create significant flows from Sequalitchew Lake into the Edmond Marsh complex to support a functional creek ecosystem, and provide for the passage of migratory fish in the Sequalitchew Creek system.
  • Rehabilitation of Edmond Marsh by removal of fill and other impediments necessary to achieve and maintain adequate flows through the marsh.
  • Rehabilitation of Sequalitchew Creek below Edmond Marsh to reduce seepage, improve fish habitat and help restore year-round flows.
  • Active management of beaver activities, using the least intrusive means possible, to maintain the hydraulic gradients that provide flows through Hamer, Bell and Edmond marshes.

At the same time restoration planning proceeds for the creek, the agreement enables CalPortland to develop a gravel mining proposal, which must undergo a new supplemental environmental impact statement review process. This process includes new opportunities for public review and comment. It’s important to note that the agreement does not approve or authorize any mining project. CalPortland must pursue the normal process with regulatory agencies as required by law.

Even if all permits to allow the South Parcel mine plan to proceed are approved, CalPortland will need to complete additional steps and satisfy several criteria before mining can begin, including groundwater testing and monitoring. The agreement also prohibits CalPortland from using any permits that allow mining in its South Parcel unless it satisfies the agreed funding obligation and all permits and approvals are in place to implement the Restoration Plan. However, if a mining permit is appealed, CalPortland will not be required to fund restoration permitting or implementation until either the appeal is resolved or CalPortland begins mining in the South Parcel.

The negotiated terms of the 2011 Settlement Agreement uphold a 1994 agreement to permanently protect Sequalitchew Creek and the ravine it flows through before emptying into Puget Sound.

For more information:

The Department of Ecology’s website (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/puget_sound/index.html)

DuPont’s website (http://www.ci.dupont.wa.us/)

CalPortland’s DuPont website (http://www.calportlandresources.com/dupont/default.aspx)

New reefs for fish habitat in Maryland

Artificial reefs for fish habitat
fish attractors

The new fishing season might seem like a long way off but we’re really only a couple months away from when folks will begin extracting fishing rods from attics and sheds, pulling winter tarps from their boats, and reviewing their charts, just to make extra sure they’re set and ready for the fun times ahead. The natural optimism found in most anglers may foster aspirations for a new fishing season filled with beautiful weather and stringers full of big fish. But in these times when it seems fishermen are so often hampered by political, environmental, and economic issues, even the most optimistic angler can sometimes have trouble keeping a smile on their face when the winter news carries so many headlines of “doom and gloom.” So it’s always refreshing to hear some good news about positive developments within the fishing industry. On that note, let me reintroduce to you the Ocean City Reef Foundation and MARI. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection.

Its activities may not always capture front-page headlines, but since 1997 the Ocean City Reef Foundation has been busy creating and enhancing offshore fish habitat through an ever-expanding network of artificial reefs. From boats to barges, cable to concrete, tanks to trains, in recent years Reef Foundation administrators have strategically submerged so much material off our shores that give fish traveling through Maryland waters a reason to reside and reproduce off our coast.

There have always been artificial reefs off Ocean City. But, until the Reef Foundation got to work, offshore structure was restricted to a small handful of boats and ships that accidentally sank, or structure that was intentionally put down by a few well meaning anglers on a very limited basis. Consequently, local wreck fishing used to be practiced by a relatively small segment of local anglers who, through years of trial and error, acquired the coordinates to the bulk of offshore structure. Since no one wants to schedule their day around fishing a certain wreck and then find someone else already anchored over it, once obtained these coordinates were very seldom shared with other fishermen. With such limited opportunities, local wreck fishing was destined to remain one of Ocean City’s best-kept secrets.

Not any more. The OC Reef Foundation has been so successful at seeding the waters that fishermen no longer have a need to keep a good thing to themselves. There’s plenty of places to fish, and plenty of fish once you get there.

When structure goes down it immediately begins to provide safe habitat for aquatic life. In relatively short order, entire living communities can establish themselves on, in, and around the structure. In areas where the ocean floor was little more than smooth bottom there becomes a living reef and complete food chain, from tiny microscopic plants and animals to large predators. The Reef Foundation is just getting warmed up; they sink structure all year and have lots more on the agenda.

A few years ago Maryland also got into the reef building business when they kicked off the Maryland Artificial Reef Initiative (MARI), which includes over 60 private, state, and federal partners, and acts as a funding mechanism (using private and corporate donations) for reef development in Maryland. It’s a volunteer organization dedicated to preserving, restoring and creating fish habitat in tidewater Maryland. Funding for MARI comes from the Coastal Conservation Association, Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the coalition of donors and partners. MARI brings together a coalition of diverse stakeholders to accomplish meaningful and measurable goals that not only benefit the sport fishing industry, but also provide priceless marine habitat. Last summer, MARI had a hand in the offshore sinking of the 564-foot warship Radford which is now in striking distance of Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey fishermen.

Though spring is still few months away, sooner or later it will be here and happy anglers will once again put to sea in hopes of enjoying their best fishing season ever. Fishermen should take comfort in knowing that the Ocean City Reef Foundation and MARI are working hard to ensure that such hopes can indeed become reality. For more information about the Reef Foundation visitwww.ocreeffoundation.com, or see www.dnr.state.md.us for details on MARI.

Written by
Mark Sampson

Managing fishery an imperfect science

gathered-hundreds-rally-u

 “It is, after all, impossible to count every fish in the ocean.”
January 22, 2012 05:18:47 PM
Valerie Garman / Florida Freedom Newspapers

MEXICO BEACH — Fishery management is a complex business, and when it comes to fishery management in the United States, the Magnuson-Stevens Act is the Bible. Continue reading “Managing fishery an imperfect science”

Maryland population grows, don’t forget the fish.

About the Fisheries Habitat and Ecosystem Program:

“LAND CONSERVATION IS FISH CONSERVATION”

The Fisheries Habitat and Ecosystem Program (FHEP) is working to understand how habitat changes impact Maryland’s fisheries in the Chesapeake Bay. Our focus has been primarily on understanding how urbanization limits habitat for fish. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection.

Maryland’s population and land use has increased significantly. The amount of land being developed outpaces population growth. Between 1973 and 2010, developed land increased by 154 percent while population grew by only 39 percent. By 2035, 1,000,000 new residents and 500,000 new homes will be added to Maryland according to the Department of Planning.

Studies by the Fisheries Habitat and Ecosystem Program have found strong links between increased development and declining fish habitat quality in tidal tributaries of Chesapeake Bay. These links have led to creation of thresholds and targets for development to consider when managing fisheries and planning for development. These thresholds and targets use impervious cover (hard surfaces such as pavement and rooftops that are impenetrable to runoff of rain and snow melt) as a measure of development. Impervious surface thresholds describe tipping points where habitat becomes poor for fish and shellfish. This is the upper limit of impervious surface. Development beyond this limit will severely limit habitat for fish and shellfish. Impervious surface targets describe a development level that can be considered safe for fish and shellfish habitat. These targets and thresholds are being communicated to planners and the public through a simple message, “land conservation is fish conservation!” as a reminder that forests, wetlands, other natural areas, and working farms are keys to productive Chesapeake Bay fisheries.

It is clear that development is a major threat to Maryland’s natural resources and the critical ecosystem functions provided by watersheds. The impact of development on aquatic habitats is quite well documented in the scientific literature. Impervious surface increases flow extremes (lower lows and more flooding), erosion, and sediment. As trees are lost, runoff temperature of water increases. Nutrients from developed lands can be as plentiful as nutrient inputs from agriculture and cause algae blooms that deplete oxygen. In winter, more roads require more salt that pollutes streams and kills freshwater organisms, including fish. Other pollutants such as toxic metals (lead for example) and organic pollutants (oil, grease, and pesticides) enter waterways in urban runoff and wastewater. Some compounds that enter wastewater treatment facilities may not be removed. These compounds may reduce success of fish spawning and make fish less safe to eat. Fish become less abundant and less diverse in polluted waters that result from high development and impervious surface.

“Every Maryland citizen lives within at least 15 minutes of a stream or river” – Maryland StreamHealth

The Fisheries Habitat and Ecosystem Program’s Mission:

FHEP Goals and Objectives

Our goal is to develop ecosystem-based fishery management strategies that will sustain fish communities in the future. In order to do this, we are working to identify fishery and ecosystem interactions with land use and water quality stressors. We work with the public and other local, state, and federal government agencies to enable Maryland’s Fisheries Service to develop ecosystem-based fishery management strategies that sustain services by fish (including shellfish) communities into the future. The role of others in ecosystem-based management is important since Fisheries Service (and even DNR) does not have authority to manage whole watersheds.

  
The Maryland Department of Natural has developed general impervious surface guidelines based on watershed size and management concern (e.g. rare, threatened, and endangered species, sportfsh management, etc.). The FHEP has adapted these thresholds and consider them when evaluating the status of the Chesapeake Bay’s fisheries. The categories for the Chesapeake Bay fisheries are:

  • 5% or less Impervious

Watersheds with 5% or less impervious surface represent target conditions. They have healthy fisheries. Habitat within the watershed is productive. Active engagement by the public and planning officials should be taken at this stage to protect, conserve, and sustain healthy fish habitat.

  • 5% – 10% Impervious

Fish habitat in watersheds between 5% – 10% impervious surface may begin to decline. Fish reproduction may become less successful as spawning habitat becomes increasingly impaired. Habitat for juvenile and adult fish becomes increasingly compromised. The public and planning officials need to conserve remaining habitat, minimize additional impacts, and revitalize damaged areas.

  • 10% or Greater Impervious

Watersheds with 10% or greater impervious surface are facing the “point of no return” of a tidal tributary to a very different and less productive status than when the watershed was less developed. Fish habitat is impaired from a variety of stressors at this stage and could be beyond the point of no recovery as development continues. Restoring a watershed to its target condition is very unlikely, but some functions might be reconstructed with limited positive success. Ecological reconstruction projects such as stormwater retrofit, impervious surface removal, or tree planting/revegetation can help mitigate impacts by reducing sedimentation and infiltrating groundwater. However, watersheds with greater than 25% impervious surface are highly altered systems, with little chance of restoring ecological integrity. Studies of restored streams do not show successful biological restoration in highly urbanized areas. In these cases, the public and planning officials should first restructure and redevelop areas of impervious surface in a watershed before attempting restoration projects.

What Can Fishermen Do?

Understand and learn what is happening in your backyard…

As fishermen, who use and enjoy Maryland’s natural resources, it is important for you to understand and learn what development and environmental impacts are occurring “in your own backyard.” The following links provide information and facts about the areas in which you may fish and-or live.

Fishermen and the public can get engaged in the planning process…

Fishermen are familiar with Maryland’s natural resources; however, there may be times in which you, as a fisherman, feel that you have no control in what is occurring around you and to your natural resources. If you are concerned you can engage in your county and watershed planning processes. The following links provide information and contacts that can help you take part in the development and land use decisions taking place in your watershed and community.

Hopes Raised for Lake Dredging and fish habitat

test4Lake Gregory dredging tour

Photo by Mike Harris

Lake Gregory dredging tour

Phil Krause, county park planner, points to areas on a map of Lake Gregory where silt has built up over the past few years. Krause was conducting an orientation tour of the lake on Dec. 21 for representatives from California Fish and Game, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and Lake Gregory Improvement Committee.

A major step toward getting approvals to dredge Lake Gregory was achieved Dec. 21 when representatives from regional agencies visited the lake for an orientation tour.

On hand for the tour were representatives from California Department of Fish and Game, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lake Gregory Improvement Committee and county Regional Parks Department. A representative from the Army Corps of Engineers was scheduled to attend, but canceled at the last minute. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the leader in  science based, proven, fish protection.

“The meeting was an excellent first step in terms of our working to get Lake Gregory dredged,” said Keith Lee, county regional parks director, who was present for the tour. “The different agencies’ representatives were incredibly helpful in providing solutions.”

The group assembled in the North Shore parking lot at 1 p.m., where Phil Krause, county park planner, started the tour with a briefing on past dredging efforts. He explained how silt and debris flowing into the lake from the silt basin near the new county library building has created large sand bars in the swimming area, limiting visitor access.

Another source for the silt is storm drains, especially those near the ball field.

After the briefing, the members walked over to the silt basin to see the area, then moved on to other areas around the lake, including areas near the Leisure Shores Community Center and the ball field where silting is a major issue.

“I think we’re moving along in a good way,” Lee added. “We won’t be able to get away from doing some California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) work, but we’re looking for ways to work together to dredge the lake and get it back to the condition that I think many in the community would like it to be in.”

Members of the Lake Gregory Improvement Committee who were on hand for the tour included Aaron Creighton, Rick Dinon (who leads the committee), Mick Hill and John Short.

“We have continually emphasized to the regulating agencies that Lake Gregory is not just a county asset, but an important asset to the Crestline and Lake Gregory community,” said Dinon. “The good news is that we’ve encountered a lot of cooperation.”

Committee member Aaron Creighton said he also was pleased with the response from the Fish and Game and Lahontan representatives who took the tour.

“We now have a vastly greater view of what needs to be done,” he said.

Creighton said that in order to get permitted by Fish and Game and Lahontan, the county has to be in compliance with CEQA.

“One of the tricky parts under CEQA is that if we remove habitat, we will have to mitigate the removal,” Creighton said. “There are two areas at Lake Gregory that need to be dredged, and the two have quite a lot of habitat.”

Part of the talk during the tour centered on creating separate habitat areas, and how it might be possible to make habitat areas protected. Other ideas included creating fish habitat areas in the deeper parts of the lake by depositing used Christmas trees weighed down by cinder blocks.

Creighton said one of the comments included that by pulling silt out of the lake, it would help improve the water quality.

“We will need an environmental impact report, and probably have to have a biological report,” he said. “We have heavy-duty problems at this lake.”

By Mike Harris, Reporter

Scroll to Top