StructureSpot

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Announces Multi-state, Multi-species Draft Environmental Impact Statement

 


The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availability of a draft Environmental Impact Statement evaluating a proposed multi-species, multi-state draft Habitat Conservation Plan and application for an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act. The HCP was developed by NiSource Inc., primarily a natural gas transmission, distribution and storage company, as it seeks an incidental take permit for operating and maintaining its network of pipelines in 14 northeastern, Midwest and southeastern states.

The Endangered Species Act requires an approved Habitat Conservation Plan before an incidental take permit is granted. HCPs are agreements between a landowner and the Service, allowing landowners to undertake otherwise lawful activities on their property that may result in the incidental death, injury or harassment of a listed species; the landowner agrees to conservation measures designed to minimize and mitigate the impact of those actions.

In its draft EIS, the Service evaluated the possible environmental impacts of implementing NiSource’s Habitat Conservation Plan and the potential effects of granting an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act. Among the alternatives evaluated by the Service are issuing a permit for 50 years, as requested by NiSource; a “no-action” alternative, under which NiSource would continue to work with the Service on a case-by-case basis for all its activities; and issuing a permit for 10 years.

NiSource’s draft HCP covers the company’s activities that may result in take of endangered or threatened species along its pipeline network. The plan addresses conservation needs for 10 federally endangered, threatened or proposed species for which take might occur, along with measures to avoid take of an additional 33 federally endangered, threatened or candidate species. NiSource’s draft HCP includes measures to avoid or reduce impacts on those species resulting from business activities, as well as mitigation practices such as protecting existing habitat, creating new habitat for protected species, and identifying research to better understand endangered species.

The Service is accepting comments on the draft EIS through October 11, 2011. Send written comments via U.S. mail to the Regional Director, Midwest Region, Attn: Lisa Mandell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN 55437-1458, or by electronic mail to permitsR3ES@fws.gov 

Public meetings will be held in Columbus, Ohio, Lexington, Kentucky, and Charleston, West Virginia during the summer 2011:

August 16, 2011, 7:00 p.m., University Plaza Hotel and Conference Center, 3110 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH 43202.

August 17, 2011, 7:00 p.m., Ramada Conference Center, 2143 N. Broadway, Lexington, KY 40505

August 18, 2011
, 7:00 pm, Charleston Ramada Plaza, 400 2nd Ave., S. Charleston, WV 25303.

More information about the EIS and HCP, along with locations, dates, and times of specific public meetings can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/permits/hcp/nisource/

The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. We are both a leader and trusted partner in fish and wildlife conservation, known for our scientific excellence, stewardship of lands and natural resources, dedicated professionals, and commitment to public service.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

For more information on our work and the people who make it happen, visit http://www.fws.gov Connect with our Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/usfws follow our tweets at http://www.twitter.com/usfwshq  watch our YouTube Channel at http://www.youtube.com/usfws and download photos from our Flickr page athttp://www.flickr.com/photos/usfwshq

AFFTA Joins TU in Opposing Bill Removing Wilderness Protections

The American Fly Fishing Trade Association (AFFTA) today joined Trout Unlimited and a host of other sporting and conservation organizations in opposing the so-called Wilderness and Roadless Area Release Act, which would remove all protections from the last, best fishing and hunting destinations in the United States.

“This bill takes direct aim at America’s sporting heritage,” said Jim Klug, co-owner of Yellow Dog Flyfishing Adventures and the chairman of the AFFTA board of directors. “Under the guise of improving access to the backcountry for all Americans—something that we all support—Congress is instead allowing the best remaining wild and native fish habitat to be developed by industry and penetrated by new roads and motorized trails. We already have enough roads and trails, and the government can’t afford to maintain even a small percentage of them today. We don’t need more roads. We need to protect what’s left of our backcountry, protect habitat, and protect our existing access.”

The bill, dubbed the Attack on our Sporting Heritage Act (ASH) by Trout Unlimited, would impact about 43 million acres of roadless backcountry from coast to coast, all on public lands within the U.S Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management systems. Inventoried roadless lands provide the best remaining fish and game habitat in the United States, and they’re vital for the persistence of wild and native trout. In the Rocky Mountain West, roadless lands shelter the bulk of the country’s remaining cutthroat trout and bull trout populations. Additionally, the best remaining spawning and rearing habitat for ocean-going steelhead and salmon is in streams flowing through or from the roadless backcountry.

“We’re grateful that AFFTA understands the intrinsic connection between habitat and opportunity,” said Steve Moyer, TU’s vice president for government affairs. “The fly fishing industry understands the opportunity public lands provide to all anglers, and keeping the backcountry just like it is today ensures the recreational fishing industry a promising future. We hope Congress will get the message and do away with this terrible idea that would tarnish the public lands that belong to every single American by birthright.”

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Roadless areas throughout the United States are accessible to all Americans—many are bounded by paved highways, and others, despite the misleading status, are accessible by dirt roads and trails. Hunting and fishing are allowed on roadless lands—in fact, the country’s best hunting harvest rates for trophy deer and elk occur in hunting units that are predominantly roadless.

“Congress needs to understand that the roadless backcountry that exists today is very limited,” Moyer said. “Keeping it like it is gives sportsmen and women the opportunity to share with their children the places that look today much like they did generations ago.

“Rather than try to pass a ‘one-size-fits-all’ bill to determine the future of our roadless backcountry, Congress should instead do what we do all the time, and work with people on the ground who have a vested interest in the future of public lands near the places they call home. Doing otherwise puts our sporting culture at risk, because once the backcountry is gone, it’s gone.”

Fish habitat projects planned at High Point, Lake Somerset

Ken CoughenourKen Coughenour of Somerset casts a white twister in hopes of hooking “a big bass” at Lake Somerset on Monday. (Staff photo by Roger Vogel)

12:36 a.m. EDT, July 19, 2011

The Somerset County Sportsmen’s League in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission’s Lake Habitat Management section will be conducting fish habitat projects at High Point Lake and Lake Somerset in August. Work will be conducted at High Point Lake on Aug. 6 and at Lake Somerset on Aug. 20.High Point Lake project volunteers are asked to meet at the north access area and boat launch at 9 a.m. on Aug. 6. This year the plan is to construct 10 porcupine cribs for deep water structure. Porcupine cribs are popular devices that are beneficial in providing cover for both game and baitfish in a lake. The PFBC and the Somerset County Sportsmen’s League will be providing all the necessary materials and tools for the project. Volunteers are needed to help with the construction of the cribs. After they are constructed on shore they will be loaded on a special boat by PFBC personnel and placed at various locations in the lake. This will be the second year for habitat work at High Point which is a popular lake in southern Somerset County. It is a 347-acre impoundment managed by the PFBC for public fishing and boating. Popular species in the lake are largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, northern pike, pickerel, walleye, yellow perch, crappies and bluegills.See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Last year’s work at High Point Lake proved popular with area fishermen and sportsmen. There were requests for an additional project at Lake Somerset. This spring the Somerset County Sportsmen’s League also entered into an agreement with the PFBC to begin a similar project at Lake Somerset. Representatives from the PFBC Lake Habitat Section and sportsmen’s league created a plan for Lake Somerset this past April.

On Aug. 20 volunteers are asked to meet at 9 a.m. at the rear of the PFBC Southwest Regional Office at Lake Somerset. The plan that day is to construct 20 porcupine crib juniors for fish habitat. They will also be built on shore and then placed at suitable locations in the lake by special boat.

Lake Somerset is a 248-acre impoundment managed by the PFBC. It is also a highly popular fishing spot. Among the most popular species in the lake are largemouth bass, walleye, northern pike, muskellunge, channel catfish, crappies and bluegills.

Volunteers who wish to help with either project may notify Don Anderson, contact person for the sportsmen’s league, at 814-634-0998.

Prospectors undermined in the media

OPINION: Suction dredging does not harm fish or fish habitat

JUL17Written by: Article Admin
7/17/2011 1:33 AM  

 Miners and prospectors have been handed a bum rap from environmental extremists for the past 40 years. Radical environmentalists tend to conjure up images of hydraulicing — an outdated and outlawed mining technique of eroding away entire mountainsides with high-powered water cannons — and strip mining, as examples of what miners have done to the environment.

Why? Because it serves their purpose.

But, what often well-meaning but misguided followers of these groups fail to realize is that suction dredging, which has surfaced as a center of controversy in the media lately, actually helps clean toxins, such as mercury and lead fishing weights left by anglers, from our streams and riverbeds. And, prospectors often pick up the trash dumped in water, on the trails and strewn over the riverbanks.

While some radical environmentalists, such as the Center for Biological Diversity, argue smallscale suction dredging harms fish and fish habitat, there has yet to be a single credible study to substantiate such alarmist findings. To the contrary, some studies even report that suction dredging creates fish habitat.

Basically, the belief that suction dredging is bad for the environment is based more on a preconceived emotional response to mining in general — a response based more on faulty assumptions than on facts and on the image of antiquated commercial mining methods.

Suction dredging does not harm fish habitat!

Furthermore, suction dredging is prohibited during spawning season as a precaution so that fish populations are not harmed. When it comes to turbidity issues, dredgers stir up the water far less than rainstorms, surface runoff from snowmelt and floods. In fact, those natural occurrences do much more to erode riverbanks and destroy fish habitat — by far — than small-scale prospectors.

To compare mining techniques of the past — some going as far back as 150 years ago — to modern small-scale prospecting and mining is nothing less than pure propaganda that should not be taken seriously and certainly not at face value — especially by the mass media.

So, now that two generations of environmental fanatics have been indoctrinating the planet with the help of the media and brainwashed soccer moms and dads feeding their children with the notion that all mining is bad, we are faced with the challenge of putting common sense back on the table. It will be an uphill battle, but it is a fight that needs to be fought
— and won —  for freedom and for future generations.

For decades, the small-scale mining community has organized and funded reclamation and reforestation projects across the country and we take pride in knowing that we fill in our holes and more often clean up the mess left by others outdoors. What little is taken from the land, we put back in reclamation and reforestation projects. We do not undercut the roots of trees. We pick up trash and we pack out what we pack in. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Gold Prospectors Association of America encourages our members to be responsible stewards of the land.

— BRAD JONES GPAA Editor / Content Director

New dock and boat house construction subject to provincial regulations

By Reg Clayton

Waterfront property owners planning to build a new dock or boathouse may be confused by provincial regulations and work permit requirements that may or may not apply to their intended projects. Ministry of Natural Resources staff can help by providing information and advice on how to proceed.

“The most commonly asked question is ‘what kind of boat house or dock can we build?'” commented Donna Derouin, who along with colleague Kevin Keith is a lands and waters specialist at Kenora district MNR.

“We welcome people to drop in or phone. People can contact us and we will get them the information they need,” Derouin said. “If property owners have specific questions that we can’t answer, we will direct them to the appropriate agency.”

MNR has two fact sheets available which outline what type of plans require a ministry work permit to build a dock or boat house on lakes or rivers, considered public land under provincial jurisdiction. Floating docks and single story boathouses do not require work permits, nor do docks and boathouses supported by posts, poles or stilts or any combination of floating and supports that do not exceed 15 sq. metres on the bed of the waterbody. However, docks and boat houses where the total surface area of cribs or other solid supporting structures constructed or placed on the waterbody bed exceeding 15 square metres do require a work permit.

Derouin noted the applications are site specific and subject to review by a ministry biologist, lands specialist and area supervisor. The biologist will determine if the project poses an impact on fish habitat or spawning areas.

“Solid structures have more impact on the lake bed and fish habitat compared to floating docks or post and pole supports,” Derouin said.

The lands specialist will ensure the structures front the owner’s property and do not impede on neighbours’ right of access to the lake or river. Neighbouring property owners are interviewed so no concerns arise after the structure is built.

“It’s important people know what they own and what their property boundaries are when building a dock,” Derouin said.

In certain circumstance federal regulations apply to the installation of float and pier (pile and post) docks where fish habitat and spawning areas is a concern and MNR may advise people to contact the Department of Oceans and Fisheries.

Additional prohibitions apply to shoreline development in designated restricted areas. Clearwater Bay is the main restricted area for development on Lake of the Woods and all construction of cabins, docks and boathouses require work permits.

The restriction was imposed following a review that determined water quality, lake trout spawning areas and habitat was affected by over-development in Clearwater Bay. As a result, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Environment imposed a minister’s order to restrict development on private property in the area. The provincial restriction is specific to unincorporated areas where municipal regulations regarding multiple habitats on a lot, inappropriate septic and grey water discharge and shoreline development do not apply.

Generally, the only type of boat house currently permitted for new shoreline construction on Ontario lakes is a single storey structure intended specifically for boat storage. Roof top decking is allowed and gazebos will be considered providing the enclosure measures 24 square metres or less and are screened on at least three sides. These types of boathouses comply with the free use policy under Ontario’s Public Lands Act.

Not covered

Two storey boathouses and boathouses with attached living accommodations were inventoried on Lake of the Woods in 2006 and their continued use is grandfathered under provincial legislation. However, the structures are not covered by the free use policy and are subject to an annual land use fee. Waterfront constructions of this kind are no longer permitted on Ontario lakes or rivers. Similar restrictions apply to floating cottages.

“The free use policy applies to single storey boat houses and no payment is required to install one,” Derouin said. “But when looking to add a second storey that’s beyond free use because that’s meant for something more than the storage of a boat.”

Therefore new construction of two storey boat houses is no longer permitted as the structures are considered to be unauthorized occupation of Crown Land. Violators are subject to removal orders issued through the courts and must bear the cost.

In certain situations MNR will work with people who have taken on such projects unaware of the new regulations in place since the Shoreline Structures Initiative of 2006. The structure can be brought into compliance through removal of the second floor or modification of the upper enclosure into an open gazebo. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

The regulations are in effect province wide. Lake of the Woods has the largest number of boathouses in Ontario after Muskoka cottage country, north of Toronto.

Local anglers can recycle fishing line for fish habitat

Posted: Saturday, July 16, 2011 2:30 pm | Updated: 4:25 pm, Wed Jul 13, 2011.

By Bill Allmann Times Sports Correspondent | 0 comments

NEW BRIGHTON — The fishing at New Brighton’s Fishing Park has always been exceptional.

The dam there adds oxygen to the water, which makes the environment conducive to fish and plentiful fish make it conducive to area anglers.

It’s rare that the reclaimed site of the original New Brighton water plant doesn’t have at least a handful of fishermen and on weekends even more.

The joy of fishing isn’t just the catching; it’s getting the line wet and enjoying the outdoors. One of the biggest headaches for any angler, though, is what to do with old fishing line.

Monofilament plastic line is fine enough that fish can’t see it, but it’s difficult to handle with wet hands and line has a tendency to tangle beyond the ability of most humans to untangle it.

Optimistic estimates are that monofilament fishing line takes 500 years to degrade in the environment and is dangerous to fish, birds, swimmers and boat propellers. Plus, it isn’t accepted in most household recycling bins.

Thanks to the Beaver County Conservation District, fishing line can be recycled locally. A receptacle at the New Brighton Fishing Park was installed Wednesday.

“We have a grant to do six as a start,” said Marty Warchol, district Watershed Specialist. “We’ll have two at Bradys Run (Park), one at the launch and one at the handicap area, one at Brush Creek, the one here at New Brighton and the last two sites are still waiting for final permission.

“The initial six bins are on a grant from the Boat USA Foundation and we’re looking at the possibility of getting more.”

Fishing line placed in the bins will be collected and forwarded to Berkley, a major fishing line manufacturer. Berkley Conservation will turn the used line into structures that can be used to enhance fish habitat.

There are no stated goals for the program. But if anglers pull old, tangled reels they thought were beyond value, the program could get quite a jump start.

This RAC project is stopping cars

July 15th, 2011

Lowman, ID – A portion of the popular Landmark – Stanley Road (Forest Road 579) will be temporarily closed from July 25 through approximately August 9 at Tennessee Creek in the Bear Valley area to remove and replace two culverts.  This project received a $43,000 grant from the Southwest Idaho RAC and will improve fish habitat and fish passage, and should also help avoid a likely blowout of the road in the future.

 

The Tennessee Creek culvert is located approximately 30 miles north of Lowman, ID within the Bear Valley Watershed.  Tennessee Creek combines with Elk Creek, then flows approximately 0.9 miles before its confluence with Bear Valley Creek. In its current condition, the Tennessee Creek culvert requires annual maintenance to repair holes in the road, resulting from the crushing/failure of the culvert that is currently installed. Eventually, the culvert is expected to fail, likely during high flows in the spring runoff period, and complete failure of the road prism is likely to result. Replacing the culvert would eliminate the risk of the road prism failure at the site and the subsequent delivery of associated road bed materials into Tennessee, Elk, and Bear Valley Creeks.

The road will be closed approximately 0.1 mile west of the Bear Valley Campground to approximately 0.5 mile east of the Elk Creek Guard Station. The Bear Valley Campground and the Elk Creek Guard Station will be accessible during project implementation. The Deadwood Reservoir area can be accessed via the Bear Valley Road (Forest Road 582) and the Bearskin Road (Forest Road 563) or the Scott Mountain Road (Forest Road 555).

 The road will be closed to all motorized access to provide for public safety and protection during construction. The two fish blocking culverts are being replaced with a concrete box culvert, which will restore fish passage further up the creek.  Restoration of unimpeded fish passage will allow Chinook salmon, bull trout, steelhead, and other fish and aquatic organisms to access habitat in the upper reaches of Tennessee Creek.

Tennessee Creek just upstream of the road crossing

The new, open bottom concrete box culvert will allow fish passage to all age classes of fish species and also repair the hydrologic function of the stream at the crossing. This structure accommodates bankfull channel width and the design incorporates stream simulation with respect to channel alignment, gradient, and substrates. The replacement structure would also accommodate 100 year flood events and related debris flows.

The lower reaches of Tennessee Creek have the potential to serve as rearing habitat for ESA listed Spring/Summer Chinook salmon and steelhead. Bull trout, which are also a listed species, are present in the watershed. Tennessee Creek, along with all other streams in the Bear Valley Watershed are designated Critical Habitat for both Spring/Summer Chinook salmon and steelhead.

Forest Road 579 is under the jurisdiction of Valley County. The culvert replacement and the temporary road closure is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service, Lowman Ranger District, the Valley County Roads Department and the Southwest Idaho RAC.

For more information contact the Lowman Ranger Station at 259-3361 or Jerry Robinson with the Valley County Roads department at 382-7195.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Local fishermen disagree over water quality

BY CONRAD SWANSON | JULY 15, 2011 7:20 AM

The Iowa City summer is filled with kids going to various camps, groups of incoming university students, and groups of people both young and old relaxing outside in the sticky heat.

One group says it’s even more relaxed than the rest, though. Anglers can be found casting their lines at the Coralville Reservoir, along the Iowa River, and in all sorts of creeks, streams, and ponds.

Lloyd Bender, a salesman in the fishing department at Fin & Feather, 125 Highway 1 W., said he sees a diverse range of people who fish.

“I see people fishing, from little kids on up,” he said. “It’s fun for everybody.”

Bender is primarily a lake fisherman, and he recently returned a fishing trip in Minnesota. While in Iowa City, he fishes at Lake Macbride and a few other locations, but he tends to avoid the Iowa River because of concerns about the water’s cleanliness.

He said his reason is that harmful elements in a fish’s habitat can be stored in the animal’s fat. He said it might be OK to eat walleyes caught in the Iowa River because the species isn’t particularly fatty, but an Iowa River catfish may not be the healthiest thing to consume on a regular basis.

Bender may have a valid point. Iowa has ranked as low as 47th out of the 50 states in per capita spending on soil conservation and water quality, Iowa’s Water & Land Conservancy Executive Director Mark Langgin told The Daily Iowan in 2010.

Not everyone is as concerned about the Iowa River’s water quality, though.

One popular fishing spot can be found where Highway 6 crosses the Iowa River, the site of a small inlet that water from the river can enter. Also located there is an outlet pipe from the Iowa City Wastewater Division, and some people sit on the concrete above the pipe while fishing.

Paul Stewart, who has fished that area for 52 years, said he isn’t concerned about the water quality. Stewart — who, despite that outlook, usually doesn’t keep the fish he catches — said that as long as there’s moving water, there shouldn’t be a problem because of potentially harmful substances from the wastewater pipe. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

“I haven’t got four arms and three eyes yet, so I think it’s OK,” he said.

Steve Julius, the senior operator at the Iowa City Wastewater Division, said he knows anglers are common up and down the Iowa River. He said anything coming from the outlet pipe is perfectly safe and that none of the fluid exiting the pipe — a substance called effluent in the wastewater business — poses a threat to the fish or fishermen near the Highway 6 spot.

“The treated effluent is meeting all the permit requirements for that flow,” Julius said. “When compared [with the river], it’s probably cleaner than the actual river itself.”

Concerns about the quality of the water aside, many of the fishing fans said they agree it’s a great activity that’s easy to learn and hard to master. Several people said the skills they use while fishing transfer to other aspects of their lives.

“Patience, attitude — there’s a lot that goes into fishing, for food or for sport,” Stewart said. “It’s a great stress reliever.”

Bender agreed, noting that a good amount of the enjoyment for him comes from its difficulty.

“There’s a little thing with a pea-sized brain, and it fools you half the time,” he said. “It’s a challenge.”

Lake Mitchell committee proposes shoreline stabilization program

Published July 14, 2011, 12:49 AM

The Lake Mitchell Advisory Committee is recommending a shoreline stabilization program along Indian Village Road.

By: Tom Lawrence, The Daily Republic

The Lake Mitchell Advisory Committee is recommending a shoreline stabilization program along Indian Village Road.

The committee proposes installing riprap along the lake between the Sportsman’s Club and the Lake Mitchell Day Camp and planting trees on the lake side of the road. Trees help stabilize the soil and would also be more attractive, committee members said.

“It’s partially about aesthetics,” said Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department Director Dusty Rodiek.

The plan was discussed during a Lake Mitchell Advisory Committee meeting Tuesday at the Rec Center. The committee passed a pair of motions to move the plan ahead. It will go to the Mitchell City Council for final approval.

SolarBee update

The SolarBee installed in the lake last summer is back on the job.

The solar-power device is intended to increase oxygen, promote fish growth and reduce algae in the lake. It was purchased and installed last year but because of the heavy and steady rains last year, its effectiveness was reduced.

Algae thrives in stagnant water, Rodiek said, and is less of a concern with high, fast-moving water.

This year, the SolarBee didn’t work when it was placed in the lake this spring. It was finally determined that the battery was dead, he said.

The battery was replaced, Rodiek said, and the SolarBee has been working for a month.

If a heavy algae bloom occurs this summer, the SolarBee is expected to help reduce it.

“That’ll be a good test to see how it’s working,” said Mark Puetz, who was presiding over his first meeting as chairman of the committee.

Potential state park

The committee briefly discussed the possibility of a state park near Mitchell.

The concept was discussed with Gov. Dennis Daugaard when he was in Mitchell last month for the Capital for a Day event.

Discussions with the governor’s staffers were also helpful, Puetz said.

“There was a lot of good feedback from the community as well,” he said.

Adopt an Access area

The committee is moving ahead on a final design for Adopt an Access signs. It’s a program introduced by Greg McCurry when he was the committee chairman, a post he resigned after being elected to the Mitchell City Council.

The committee wants to spend $50 or less per sign, Puetz said. So far, more than 12 groups or individuals have agreed to “adopt” a public access area along the lake and ensure it is well maintained.

Teen help hired

A group of young people has been hired by the city to clean up access areas and do other jobs, according to Rodiek.

The city hired 15- and 16-year-olds to perform those tasks. Rodiek said there are morning and afternoon crews, both made up of about five teens,

They work about 14 hours a week in four, four-hour shifts, and are paid minimum wage.

“That’s a tough age for kids to find employment. It’s a good opportunity for them to develop some job skills,” he said.

“The plus for us, we get them started in the system and they learn some of the expectations we have and it’ll be a good feeder system for our own seasonal staff,” Rodiek said. “It’s a good source for us to hire good staff. The ones that work out, we can hire them in the future.”

Fish habitat

The committee wants to continue to place rocks and other material in the lake to improve fish habitat.

Committee members discussed the difference between round rocks and rocks of other shapes. Some members said round rocks seem to work best, although Rodiek said there is no scientific evidence that is true.

The committee said farmers have long been a source of rocks for the lake and for other purposes, but more farmers are using the rocks themselves and are less likely to give them away.

Puetz’s parents donated a large pile of rocks stored near the lake that were used for building a trail project, and some are left over.

They are available for a variety of purposes, he said.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Tags: 

Loss of Top Predators Has Far-Reaching Effects

SCIENCE — July 14, 2011 at 3:30 PM EDT

Loss of Top Predators Has Far-Reaching Effects

BY: JENNY MARDER

Photo credit: Young aspen trees in Yellowstone National Park. Photo by William Ripple, courtesy of Oregon State University.

Sea otters eat sea urchins and sea urchins eat kelp. When sea otters are present, the coastal kelp forests maintain a healthy balance. But when the fur trade wiped out the otters in the Aleutian Islands in the 1990s, sea urchins grew wildly, devouring kelp, and the kelp forest collapsed, along with everything that depended on it. Fish populations declined. Bald eagles, which feed on fish, altered their food habits. Dwindled kelp supplies sucked up less carbon dioxide, and atmospheric carbon dioxide increased.

The animal that sits at the top of the food chain matters, and its loss has large, complex effects on the structure and function of its ecosystem, according to an article published on Thursday in the online issue of the journal, Science.

That the presence or loss of an ecosystem’s top predator is linked to surges and crashes in the food chain is nothing new. The term for the phenomenon is “trophic cascade,” and it’s been applied to coastal sea otters, as well as the gray wolves in Yellowstone and the mountain lions in Zion National Park, to name just a few.

But what is new, authors of the paper say, is that this is ubiquitous across all ecosystems. “We see it on land, we see it on water, we see it in high latitudes, we see it in low latitudes,” said James Estes, a research scientist at the Institute for Marine Sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz and the paper’s lead author. “We do not not see it anywhere.”

The paper says that ecosystems are built around “interaction webs” within which every species can influence many other species. And the full impact of the loss of a top predator cannot be fully understood until the species has disappeared, but once gone, its absence can have far-reaching effects on water quality, air quality, disease patterns and fires.

Among the examples cited in the paper: A rinderpest epidemic devastated the population of wildebeest in the Serengeti, resulting in a growth of woody plants, which has led to more frequent wildfires. The decline of lions and leopards in Africa has corresponded with changes in the behaviors of olive baboons, leading them to interact more with human food and farms, and most likely causing a rise in intestinal parasites.

The article is a synthesis of the work of more than 20 scientists, and an outgrowth of a symposium held at the White Oak Plantation, near Jacksonville, Fla. in 2008 to study the impacts of large predators across global systems. “At the end of the symposium, we were all sitting around, and there was just this overwhelming sense that there really is a message here that needs to be integrated and put out there,” Estes said. “There was frustration that some of our colleagues didn’t realize the importance of large consumers. So we said, ‘let’s get a collection of credible people from around the world, mostly senior people who have worked in a diversity of global ecosystems, and see what consensus they may have.'”

The team included theoreticians and scientists who study forest, marine and freshwater ecosystem ecology in North America, South America, Africa and Europe.

“It’s not reporting on any new findings, but I would say its value is that it is a synthesis,” said Matthew Kauffman, a professor at the University of Wyoming, who is not part of the study. “It’s showing us that there are top-down effects of large predators and large herbivores among many different ecosystems, functioning in many different ways. It allows us to see the full scope of the value of having top predators in ecosystems.”

William Ripple, professor of forestry at Oregon State University, and a co-author of the study, has studied the disappearance and reintroduction of gray wolves in Yellowstone, and the influence these events have had on the surrounding animals and plants. “We cored the trees, counted the tree rings and found that the aspen trees stopped regenerating after the wolves were killed off,” he said. By connecting the dots, his team developed a hypothesis: aspen tree growth and wolves are linked. Without wolves as predators, elk populations thrived, eating seedlings and wiping out many of the young aspen trees.

Since the wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone, some aspens, cottonwoods and willows appear to be growing back. Ripple believes this is because elk, which are fewer in number and more skittish when wolves are present, are eating fewer seedlings, allowing for more tree growth.

And it doesn’t stop at the plants, Ripple said. The resurgence of the plants has corresponded with more insects, birds and beavers. The beavers dam up the streams and make ponds, altering the stream ecology and fish habitat.

Scientists don’t all agree on these mechanisms. Kauffman’s research, for example, found that the behavior of the elk has not changed significantly since the wolves returned. More important to new tree growth, he said, is that wolves are directly reducing the elk population through predation.

But most scientists do agree that the influence of the presence or absence of top predators is far reaching. “It’s intuitive, it’s very obvious, yet nobody wants to talk about it,” said Paul Dayton, a professor of marine ecology at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who was not a part of the study. “People like me will give talks about it and wave our arms around. “But I’ve never seen all these ecosystems and identical patterns merged into one paper.”

Estes says that there needs to be a “gross rethinking” of the way management decisions are made.”

Dayton’s hope is that the research will prompt land managers and conservationists to focus on species interactions, rather than extinctions. “Right now, we manage through the Endangered Species Act,” he said. “And it’s a horrible way to manage ecosystems. We’re not managing them, we’re trying to save little fragments in zoos. What we need to do is manage these interactions.”

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Scroll to Top