StructureSpot

Come and have brunch for a good cause July 20

The Andrew Daniels Fish Stewardship Program is having its first ever Fish Stock Brunch in Lake of Bays on Weds., July 20.

The gathering takes place from 11:30 a.m. until 2 p.m. at Port Cunnington Lodge.

The stewardship program started in 2006. Daniels was an avid fisherman in the Lake of Bays area prior to his death. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

“Bob Ransom and Bruce Montgomery, two guys on the lake here, decided to do something in Andrew’s memory,” said David Macdonald, the program’s director of special projects. “Since he was a big fisher guy, they decided to start the program.”

The root of the program goes a little further back. In 2002, the township of Lake of Bays settled out-of-court for $25,000 with the developer of Bigwin Island, Alan Peters. It was alleged that one of the contractors working on the redevelopment of the iconic Bigwin property had allowed silt to seep into the lake, potentially negatively affecting water quality.

Using funds from that settlement, the stewardship program launched with a mandate to protect the Lake of Bays fish habitat, improve regeneration and the general water quality in the area.

“Everyone involved in this effort has a love of Lake of Bays, and to participate in an effort to preserve and restore this lake is meaningful and our goal,” Macdonald said.

At the brunch, guests will be treated to a beef or fish meal, salads and dessert. There will be music by Darryl Hollingsworth & Co., karaoke, a raffle, a silent auction.

The program has undertaken a variety of projects since launching, according to Macdonald.

“They’ve done different things,” he said. “They’ve had students go around the lake and map out the wetland areas and where’s the best fishing, and what needs to do be done to make sure there’s no shoreline erosion.”

The program has also been involved in habitat and stock rehabilitation, culvert replacement projects and the study of spawning patterns.

“It saddens me to see the abuse of some of our streams where people have thrown in things such as diapers and old tires,” said Jacquie Goddard, the secretary of the stewardship program. “I cannot say enough good things about the excellent results of our stream rehab program and hard working team members.”

You can help out by attending the brunch. Tickets cost $25 and can be obtained by emailing adfsp@live.com or at the Dwight Garden Centre, 705-635-1696.

“The Refuge” 6-pack artificial fish habitat structures and attractors

SKU:
oas-6
Weight:
142.00 LBS
Rating:
Shipping:
Free Shipping
Bookmark and Share Starter pack fishiding artificial fish habitat structures. A dozen of the three most popular fish holding structures. (4) Keeper, (4) Safehouse, (4) Cradle

Product Description:

Here is what you have been asking for! A substanial addition to any habitat plans, this deeper water structure group, has room for all ages and sizes of fish.

With three each of the Keeper and Safehouse, this resting area provides a total of 318 square feet of surface area.

The right amount of cover to create room for fish to rest and feed in the same location.

These six units will cover an area between 20×10 feet, or a line over 30 feet long.

Experiment with different layouts with each additional refuge you install.

Keeper:

Maximum shade and protection is abundant throughout this eco. friendly product made with reclaimed pvc material. With limbs all standing a full 48″, these 2-1/2″-3-1/2″ wide surfaces grow algae and aquatic life quickly.

Each keeper weighs approx. 28 pounds, and is recommended for depths over 10 feet. This large and somewhat coarse cover, provides habitat for all sizes of fish.

Bass,crappie,panfish alike utilize the shading effects of this new type of artificial fish attractor. Go-green and promote fish habitat restoration! Made in the USA with all American made materials.

Reclaimed pvc limbs provide an eco.-friendly solution to fish habitat loss and degradation.

Safehouse:

These safehouse fish habitat units stand 46″ tall and weigh 16 pounds each. This fish attractor has all the needed shade and coverage to hold all sizes of fish.

Consisting of limbs ranging in width from 2.5″-3.5″ wide and 18″-46″ tall, they open to a full 72″ wide. With a minimum of 44 square feet of surface area, it provides plenty of room for algae and shade to attract fish.

Recommended for depths of 6′-12′. Reclaimed pvc limbs provide an eco.-friendly solution to fish habitat loss and degradation.

Bend to shape by hand to any desired shape and toss in water. Sinks itself. Made in the USA with all American made materials.

Over 44 square feet surface area each.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.


Find Similar Products by Category


Write your own product review

Product Reviews

  1. perfect price and size 

    Posted by Unknown on 27th Apr 2011

    thanks for adding this group of structure. i alraedy bought two keepers and they work good.Will be ordering more of these groups sonn.


Don’t Forget StructureSpot When Adding Artificial PVC Fish Attractors in Your Pond

Check out this story on placing fish attractoors with precise placement.  http://www.bradwiegmann.com/pond-fishing/pond-management/601-dont-forget-structurespot-when-adding-artificial-pvc-fish-attractors-in-your-pond-.html

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Attach the StructureSpots to your Fishiding units when sinking them to mark their location.Fishiding homepage

StructureSpot ShallowSpotStructureSpot DeepSpot

Fish Habitat Study Underway at Table Rock Lake

Missouri Conservation Department hopes to have useful information to share with anglers when the study is complete
ARTICLE | JULY 12, 2011 – 11:05AM | BY MICHELE SKALICKY

About four years ago, the Missouri Department of Conservation, along with a few other organizations began the Table Rock Lake National Fish Habitat Initiative, a project designed to maintain and improve fish habitat in Table Rock.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Since then, as part of that initiative, more than 1500 fish habitat structures have been created in the lake.  Now, biologists are in the middle of a radio-telemetry study that’s expected to provide information about behavior and habitat use of largemouth bass.

Shane Bush, fisheries management biologist for the Conservation Department, says the main reason for the study is to evaluate the large-scale habitat project…

“Because it’s a project of this calibur, we really want to evaluate whether this habitat’s working or whether it’s not, you know, and just kind of help us to learn what works and what doesn’t work as well so that, when the project’s completed and other state agencies want to use this data, we can give them a good paper and say that, you know, ‘this is what worked well and this is what didn’t work well,’ because this study is designed to be a pilot project in a more broad national project focused on habitat restoration in large reservoirs throughout the country.”

Earlier this year, 60 legal-sized largemouth bass were collected from the Kings River Arm of Table Rock Lake and surgically implanted with radio tags.  They were then released back into the lake.

Bush says, besides habitat use, they hope to learn some more things about the fish…

“Those fish will also be studied to track their daily and seasonal movements around the lake to give biologists a better understanding of just overall movements of bass to help answer public inquiries and just learn more overall about the bass’s behavior in the lake.”

Each fish is located once per month during daylight hours.  Every three months, a smaller number of the tagged fish will be tracked for a full 24-hour period to monitor daytime and nighttime movements.

Scuba surveys are also being conducted—divers go down to view the habitat structures to record what kinds of fish are using them.

If an angler catches a tagged largemouth bass, Bush hopes they’ll release it back into the lake so it can be studied further.  The fish are easily recognizable since they have an antenna protruding from their abdomen.  They also are marked with an orange tag near their dorsal fin…

“That orange tag actually has a number on it, and if anglers would just call our office and give us that number and tell us where they caught the fish, how big the fish was  or whether it was release or kept and where it was released, that would just provide us with a lot of information.”

You can call the Conservation Department office in Branson at 334-4859.

Bush says they’ll add more habitat structures to Table Rock Lake starting in October–the Table Rock Lake National Fish Habitat Initiative runs thru 2012.

He says they don’t have much information from the radio-telemetry study to share yet, but he expects to have useful information for anglers when the study’s finished in about a year.

concern runs deep for fish habitat

Colorado sportsmen’s concern runs deep for fish habitat in wake of Yellowstone River oil spill

By David O. Williams
Real Aspen – July 6, 2011
Sportsmen’s groups as far away as Colorado are deeply concerned about the potential degradation of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from Friday’s ExxonMobil oil spill in the pristine Yellowstone River 20 miles upstream from Billings, Mont. 

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

“One of the things we always look at is the economic impact of hunting and fishing to the state economy,” said Gaspar Perricone, co-founder and co-director of the Denver-based Bull Moose Sportsmen’s Alliance. “In Montana, wildlife-related activity generates $1.1 billion annually, and of that, $759 million comes specifically from hunting and angling.

“Any time there’s a threat to the habitat, you obviously run the risk of impairing some of the tourism to a place like Yellowstone as well as the opportunity for quality hunting and fishing.”

 

 

Oil in Montana’s Yellowstone River.
Alexis Bonogofsky of the National Wildlife Federation

Friday’s pipeline break, which the company now admits spilled more than 1,000 barrels of oil (or at least 42,000 gallons) is more than 100 miles downstream from Yellowstone National Park. But the river near the town of Laurel, where the rupture occurred, is known for world-class fishing.Wildlife officials told MSNBC they don’t expect to see short-term impacts such as dead fish floating on the surface, but they are worried about long-term effects on small forms of aquatic life that fish eat. That would adversely impact the fish habitat on the nation’s longest undammed river.

As of Wednesday, more than 440 people were working to soak up the oil, according to a press release from Region 8 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which includes Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

“[Wednesday] EPA issued an order to ExxonMobil, pursuant to the Clean Water Act, directing the company to take a number of clean-up and restoration activities as a result of an oil spill into the Yellowstone River,” the release reads. “EPA will continue in its role in directing and overseeing the cleanup and restoration of the river and ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.

“EPA is coordinating its response actions with the Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and state and local agencies and will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure ExxonMobil, as the responsible party, addresses any and all potential impacts of this spill.”

Environmental groups have already begun questioning Exxon’s estimates of the size and scope of the spill.

Alexis Bonogofsky, whose family farm is in Laurel, told CNN oil has polluted the edge of her farmland to the point that she can’t let her animals graze. “You go down to where the oil is,” she said, “and you don’t hear anything anymore. No birds, no toads, no crickets, nothing. It’s just silent.”

Bonogofsky is the daughter of Debra Bonogofsky, a moderate Republican businesswoman who last year told the Colorado Independent she was the victim of a “smear campaign” orchestrated by Western Tradition Partnership – a pro-oil-and-gas political advocacy group originally registered in Colorado.

Bonogofsky filed a formal complaint against the group with the Montana Commissioner of Political Practices, whodetermined WTP violated Montana campaign finance and disclosure laws in a 2008 legislative race. WTP, now American Tradition Partnership, describes itself as a “no-compromise grassroots organization dedicated to fighting the radical environmentalist agenda.”

WTP and ATP have been very active in Colorado political races in recent years, targeting Democrats who favor more renewable energy and challenging the state’s aggressive renewable energy standard.

While Colorado in recent years has not seen a high-profile spill along the lines of the Montana pipeline break or recent ruptures in Michigan and Illinois, Perricone’s Bull Moose group in May released a report detailing more than 1,000 small spills of more than 5.6 million gallons of oil, wastewater and other drilling fluids in three western Colorado counties over the past decade.

“If we develop our natural resources in an appropriate manner, then wildlife-related activity is a well than can be tapped in perpetuity,” Perricone said. “However, if we get to the point where the extraction of our natural resources damages wildlife and wildlife habitat to the degree that it can’t recover, then that certainly is not a place that we’d like to find ourselves.”

 

proposed suit over fish habitat………

Official: ‘Misperception’ to blame for proposed suit over fish habitat

1:41 AM, Jul. 9, 2011  |

RIVERSIDE — A dozen Inland Empire water agencies poised to wage a legal battle against the Obama administration over its decision to expand the habitat of an endangered fish may be laboring under a “misperception” about the impact of the edict, a federal official said Friday.

The Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Riverside Public Utilities and 10 other agencies are threatening to file a lawsuit to stop the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service from enlarging protected space for the Santa Ana Sucker.

According to the plaintiffs, a December ruling by federal officials would effectively shut off 125,800-acre-feet of water, depriving the region of one-third of its current fresh water stocks.

Representatives from the water agencies will be taking their complaints to members of the California congressional delegation on Monday.

According to USFWS spokeswoman Jane Hendron, the utilities are making a federal case out of a dispute based largely on superficialities, not actual harm.

Hendron said the “critical habitat” designation behind the controversy will not hinder use of water supplies.

“There’s a misperception about critical habitat. People don’t realize that it does not trigger any specific action,” Hendron told City News Service.

She said the designation provides an “additional layer of review” before developers or municipalities can proceed with making any changes along waterways that have been recognized as critical to a threatened species.

In the case of the Santa Ana Sucker, the U.S. Department of Interior’s “Final Rule” dictates that any planned modifications to the area encompassing the river’s headwaters in the San Bernardino Mountains be cleared by the USFWS or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

The Sucker’s habitat has been further degraded by construction of the Seven Oaks Dam, which has “significantly altered the natural hydrological regime,” Hendron said. “This does affect habitat downstream. What you do upstream can affect the downstream environment,” she said. According to the water agencies, efforts to preserve the Sucker have been successful, and the federal ruling threatens to destabilize the region. Federal officials issued findings in 2005 that concluded state and local conservation efforts to protect the Sucker were paying off. However, last year, USFWS representatives reversed course. Citing a 2004 study, they declared gravel and cobble substrate required for the endangered fish’s survival had been drastically reduced since dam construction. Federal officials want higher volumes of water released from the dam to uncover substrate, which promotes algae growth and spawning grounds. Last month, a fact-finding committee composed of local and federal officials determined that stronger flows produced by releasing dam water often had the opposite effect of what was intended, creating high levels of sediment and murky underwater conditions — negatives for the fish. Local water agencies argue that the amount of water to be restricted for the benefit of the amphibian could be used to replenish regional water stocks and help reduce the region’s dependence on water imports from the San Joaquin Delta, which is already under a federal pumping limit to protect the endangered Delta Smelt.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Teamwork helps rebuild Dairyland Flowage’s fish habitat

Dairyland FlowageJoe Knight

Dairyland Flowage

Students from Flambeau, Bruce and Ladysmith high schools hauled trees out to deeper water Tuesday in the Dairyland Flowage.

Related Video

Posted: Thursday, July 7, 2011 11:55 pm | Updated: 7:45 am, Fri Jul 8, 2011.

By Joe Knight Leader-Telegram staff |

LADYSMITH – The day was warm, the water temperatures hovering between 89 and 90 degrees, making it more comfortable for students from three Rusk County high schools who spent the morning up to their necks in water.

Some students in a boat mixed cement to anchor individual spruce trees to the bottom of the Dairyland Flowage while others swam or waded with trees they positioned at the sides of submerged rock piles. The rocks had been dropped through the ice along the shore during the winter.

The position of the rocks had been marked with a GPS. Those coordinates, plus some searching by students, helped locate the piles this summer. The individual trees with cement foundations would be placed between the rock piles to provide additional cover.

The idea is to provide a diversity of habitat to give minnows and small fish a place to live, which in turn will provide food for bigger fish, said Jerry Carow of the Rusk County Wildlife Restoration Association, the nonprofit group coordinating the project.

The work began three years ago when Dairyland Power Cooperative drew down the reservoir to repair a dam. The association and Dairyland Power took the opportunity to haul rocks and trees onto the dry lake bed to create aquatic habitat.

When the power company refilled the lake, they saw no reason to stop creating habitat. They just had to change their methods, Carow said. Because Dairyland Power has a five-year permit from the state Department of Natural Resources to create habitat in the lake, they decided to keep going with that work.

Since the project began three years ago, the power company has brought in about 6,400 cubic yards of rock – the equivalent of a four-mile stretch of rock three feet wide and three feet high, Carow said.

So far the project has involved the installation of about 2,000 trees. Another 500 to 1,000 could be added, Carow said.

The project involves students from Flambeau, Bruce and Ladysmith high schools during summer months. During the rest of the year, prisoners from Flambeau Correctional Center provide the labor.

Fat fish

The habitat work appears to be helping fish in the flowage, said John Thiel, senior environmental biologist with Dairyland Power.

Natural reproduction of walleyes always has been good on the flowage, an impoundment of the Flambeau River, but growth of the fish typically has been slow, he said. Now the walleyes are growing faster.

“We’ve had a 2-inch increase in the average size of walleyes we’ve collected,” Thiel said.

During the next few years, more walleyes should be moving into the legal size range, he said.

Black crappies have become more abundant and also are growing well, Thiel said. Bluegills are not abundant in the flowage but are more common now than they were, as are perch and smallmouth bass.

When the reservoir was created in the early 1950s, the power company removed trees logs and stumps along the shoreline. Officials at the time figured drifting wood might interfere with power generation.

“At the time they didn’t realize they were removing all the good fish habitat,” Thiel said. “What the lake really needs is shallow water fish habitat.”

The reservoir always has been home to big muskies, but the waterway is low on suckers, a favorite food of muskies. One potential problem was a perched road culvert on nearby Crooked Creek that may have been blocking upstream spawning movements of suckers and other fish in the spring. Officials lowered the culvert so fish could get upstream, and they plan to survey the creek later this summer to find evidence of spawning by suckers, Thiel said.

Regulations

Dairyland Power and the wildlife association had wanted to bring in heavy equipment and move some existing gravel on the reservoir’s bottom three years ago when the reservoir was drained, but the DNR nixed that idea because of mercury contamination in the sediment. The mercury came from paper plants upstream.

Thiel thought the project could have been completed without recirculating mercury in the system – Dairyland had done some testing of the sediments – but the power company lost that argument.

That decision caused Dairyland Power to change plans and downsize the reefs they wanted to build, but, with the help of the wildlife association and other community groups, fish habitat in the flowage is much improved, he said.

Summer jobs

This is the fourth summer that Charlie Coughenour, a student at Ladysmith High School, has done conservation work for the Rusk County Wildlife Restoration Association.

“It’s a lot of fun. It gives me something to do in the summer, plus I get paid,” said Coughenour, who will be a senior this fall.

Twenty-four high school students worked this summer on the project, which included fish habitat improvement, repairing erosion sites, building a nature trail and creating fishing access sites.

Students work for five weeks and earn $24 per day, plus one-half of a high school credit. The students are supervised by teachers and four college interns.

Coughenour said he has learned some construction skills in the program and it’s also influenced his career choice. He plans to attend UW-Stevens Point and study environmental science.

Knight can be reached at 715-830-5835, 800-236-7077 or joe.knight@ecpc.com.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Give managed forestry credit for the fish habitat at Battle Creek

Another View: Give managed forestry credit for the fish habitat at Battle Creek

By David A. Bischel
Published: Sunday, Jun. 26, 2011 – 12:00 am | Page 3E

Re “Governor needs to keep pledge at Battle Creek” (Editorial, June 21):

The Bee’s editorial board took what should have been a positive story about removing dams and instead pandered to unfounded fears to suggest that forestry harms fish-recovery efforts, even though forestry is included in watershed restoration precisely to benefit salmon. Not only is forest management not an obstacle, forestry helps fund restoration that must otherwise be paid for by taxpayers or wouldn’t happen at all.

At issue is the Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration project, which according to the California Department of Fish and Game will “re-establish access to 42 miles of premier spawning and rearing habitat for spring- and fall-run chinook salmon and steelhead.” This ideal fish habitat has been created by decades of active forest management in the watershed, including clear-cutting that some want to ban.

Science shows that carefully managed forestry operations can create ideal spawning habitat, conserve water resources and protect watersheds against high-intensity wildfire. California clear-cuts create small openings, are replanted with native species by law and establish biologically diverse forests of all ages on the landscape.

Humboldt State University’s John-Pascall Berrill notes that “clear-cutting is a process that cannot be judged in a single moment in time” and that the “water-quality impacts of clear-cutting in California are likely within the range of natural disturbance.” Site-specific research from Battle Creek shows virtually no negative impacts on water quality from harvest activities.

Rather than note that forest management has established ideal salmon habitat at Battle Creek, The Bee assumes that restoration will not be managed carefully and that having two agencies work to conserve water quality is a conflict of missions.

The Bee’s editorial went on to encourage Gov. Jerry Brown to adopt a budget that would impose new harvest-plan review fees. We think this could add about $40,000 per plan to fees already roughly 10 times higher than those in neighboring Oregon and Washington. This short-sighted suggestion fails to recognize that additional fees would cripple businesses already reeling from the highest permitting costs in the nation, cost jobs in rural communities suffering disproportionally high unemployment, and dismantle the infrastructure absolutely essential to addressing California’s wildfire crisis.

Harvest-plan review costs have nearly doubled since 1997 despite an 80 percent decline in harvest operations. Imposing fees on forest landowners will not make the process more efficient but could eliminate the forestry sector in California, bankrupt counties struggling to provide social services and kill the rural way of life.

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/26/3726139/give-managed-forestry-credit-for.html#ixzz1RKWhIgBB

spotlight back on pipeline safety

exxon tanker
By David O. Williams07.05.11

ExxonMobil workers on Tuesday were scrambling to add staff and finds ways to work in swift-moving flood waters to soak up more than 40,000 gallons of oil the company spilled into Montana’s pristine Yellowstone River Friday night.

yellowstone-oil-spill

Exxon oil spill in Montana’s Yellowstone River puts spotlight back on pipeline safety

By David O. Williams07.05.11 | 3:40 pm
  • ExxonMobil workers on Tuesday were scrambling to add staff and find ways to work in swift-moving flood waters to soak up more than 40,000 gallons of oil the company spilled into Montana’s pristine Yellowstone River Friday night.

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer toured the area southwest of Billings Tuesday morning and told CNN he was very worried about long term impacts to fish habitat.

“My biggest concern is those 1,000 barrels,” Schweitzer said. “You cannot dump (that much oil) into a pristine trout stream without causing damage to the fisheries.”

Exxon officials Tuesday still weren’t sure exactly why a pipeline in the river cracked. But property owners downstream were reporting oil washing up on their land and the strong smell of oil in the air.

Canadian media reports speculated the spill could dampen the enthusiasm of Montana residents for a major oil and gas pipeline project slated to connect the oil fields of Alberta to refineries on the Gulf Coast of Texas.

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline would pass deep under the Yellowstone River in Montana and then travel through South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma. It needs U.S. State Department approval because it would cross the border with Canada.

“I think that Montana had in the past not really been too concerned about the Keystone XL pipeline, and I think [the Exxon spill] is really going to change that,” Susan Casey-Lefkowitz of the Natural Resources Defense Council told CanadaBusiness.com.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has told the U.S. State Department that environmental review of the Keystone XL project has so far been inadequate to approve the project.

“Pipeline oil spills are a very real concern,” wrote Cynthia Giles, EPA’s assistant administrator for enforcement and compliance assurance, according to the Huffington Post. Giles pointed to recent spills in Michigan and Illinois, and the first phase of the Keystone pipeline has seen 12 spills already in its first year. See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

And while Keystone XL would travel to the east of Colorado, regulatory officials in this state say pipeline leaks, waste pit spills and bad cement casing of well bores are all greater concerns than groundwater contamination from hydraulic fracturing, a drilling process that has drawn much more media attention lately.

Yellow fish boost Langley environment

A Langley drain-marking program aims to educate people about their impact on fish habitat.

POSTMEDIA NETWORK INC. JULY 5, 2011
A Walnut Grove family marked storm drains together in the Yorkson Creek neighbourhood.

A Walnut Grove family marked storm drains together in the Yorkson Creek neighbourhood.

Photograph by: submitted, for Langley Advance

All drains lead to fish habitat.

It’s a widely misunderstood fact that Langley Environmental Partners Society (LEPS) wants to clear up for everyone.

In urban areas, storm drains on paved streets and parking lots collect rainwater runoff.

The runoff – containing sediments, animal waste, oil, swimming pool water, and toxic household or industrial compounds – all goes into storm drains. It does not go into the domestic sewage system.

Storm drains empty the untreated runoff into nearby waterways, impacting fish habitat.

Just one drop of motor oil can make 50 litres of water unlivable for water species.

LEPS’s 4th annual Storm Drain Marking Challenge is running through July.

Participants are asked to mark storm drains with the iconic yellow fish that alerts people that the drains lead to fish habitat.

Prizes for the most drains marked will be awarded.

To find out more and to collect your storm drain marking materials contact Lina Azeez at lazeez@tol.ca or 604-532-3517. www.leps.bc.ca/events

Langley Environmental Partners Society (LEPS) is a non-profit, partnership-driven organization, founded in 1993, to achieve the mission of “protecting and restoring the natural environment through education, cooperation and action.”

Read more:http://www.langleyadvance.com/Yellow+fish+boost+Langley+environment/5054070/story.html#ixzz1RKUUNWfa

 

See the dozens of unique artificial fish habitat models, fish attractors and fish cover used at fishiding.com, the industry leader and only science based, man made and artificial fish habitat, proven to provide all fish with cover they prefer to prosper.

Scroll to Top